PlayerSells
Back to @aDilipak's profile

Abdurrahman Dilipak engagement report

@aDilipak - 945K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.053%
of 945K followers
Per impression
1.71%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
3.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
496
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 496 interactions against 945K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Abdurrahman Dilipak's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.053%, Abdurrahman Dilipak sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,985 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.05% to 0.331%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.05%
p750.331%
p902.50%
p99332.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 10,985 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 369,134 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.05%
75th percentile0.331%
90th percentile2.50%
99th percentile332.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link34% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 1322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 202641x their median

    Terremoto en la OMS. Dimisiones en bloque y además, 2400 despidos masivos por quiebra, 900 de ellos en Ginebra. El 25% de la plantilla El Director Científico Jeremy Farrar dimite tras destaparse que se ocultó el origen del virus. La jefa de datos Yukiko Nakatani huye tras fuertes disputas internas. El barco se hunde.

    13K6.4K554671305K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202617x their median

    🚨¡TRUMP LO SOLTÓ SIN FILTRO Y EN CÁMARA! El 5G y el 6G no son “más megas”. Son el escáner que te atraviesa. Frente a los jefes de la tech el presidente tiró la frase exacta: «¿Qué hace el 6G? ¿Te da una visión un poco más profunda de la piel de alguien? ¿Ves lo perfecto que es?» Lo dijo. Quedó grabado. Y de golpe lo que te vendieron como “progreso” se convierte en vigilancia que traspasa ropa, paredes… y carne. No es para que el video cargue más rápido. Son ondas milimétricas y terahercios convertidas en herramienta: mapean tu cuerpo al instante, leen signos vitales, fabrican tu gemelo digital y dejan tu intimidad como un archivo abierto para quien tenga la llave. Te prometieron conexión. Te están entregando el panóptico total: nada fuera de la red, nada oculto, ni tu habitación ni tus órganos. Trump lo soltó. Los de adentro ya lo sabían. La misma gente que empuja IA, identidades digitales y CBDC quiere verte transparente ante sus ojos que todo lo miran. «Mira lo perfecto que es…» sonrió. Y el sistema aplaudió. Se burlaron de los “locos del 5G”. Ahora el propio presidente está dejando el hilo a la vista. Tu turno, normie: ¿sigues hipnotizado con el rectángulo brillante mientras convierten el aire en una prisión de señales? ¿O por fin vas a rechazar la cárcel inteligente? Quédate atento. La próxima gota va a doler.

    5.4K2.8K129104324K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202611x their median

    Şimdiye kadar üretilmiş en ayrıntılı insan hücresi 3D rekonstrüksiyonlarından biri... Bu görsel, X-ışını tomografisi, nükleer manyetik rezonans (NMR) ve kriyo-elektron mikroskopisi verilerini birleştirerek, tek bir ökaryotik hücrenin içinde sıkışmış olan şaşırtıcı moleküler karmaşıklığı ortaya koyuyor. Dışarıdan basit görünen şey, aslında moleküler makineler, zarlar, proteinler ve organellerin hepsinin birlikte çalıştığı inanılmaz derecede yoğun bir dünyanın ta kendisidir. Bu sadece bir hücre. Ve vücudumuzda tahminen bunun gibi 30 trilyon hücre var. Bütün hücreler birbiriyle haberleşiyor, beraber çalışıyor. Gel de Yaradan'a inanma. https://t.co/PsUPivxq0s

    4.1K1.2K14349126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.7x their median

    🚨🚨 En los años 1920, Justin Christofleau, un panadero francés, descubre que la Tierra y la atmósfera forman una pila eléctrica natural... Planta en su jardín antenas de cobre, alambres de hierro e imanes… y ahí, el milagro: Patatas de 1 kg Zanahorias de 2 kg Puerros gruesos como brazos Cero fertilizantes químicos... Rendimientos ×3... Cosechas 3 semanas antes. Alemania le ofrece 10 millones de francos por su patente. Él se niega por patriotismo... ¿Resultado? Sus máquinas son destruidas, sus publicaciones prohibidas, y la palabra "electrocultura" es borrada de los diccionarios franceses... Hoy, miles de jardineros lo hacen de nuevo en secreto...

    2.9K1.3K233483K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20268.5x their median

    🚨🚨 "Una dieta baja en sal causa resistencia a la insulina y presión arterial alta"... Dr Ben Bikman, PhD "Un médico nunca debería decirle a un paciente que 'reduzca la sal'... Esto causa niveles más altos de insulina y mayor presión arterial." La sal es el segundo componente principal en el cuerpo y necesitamos sal en todo momento. Cuando se restringe la ingesta de sal, el cuerpo activa sistemas hormonales para retener sodio y causar resistencia a la insulina: Activación del sistema renina-angiotensina-aldosterona (SRAA): • Restringir el sodio hace que el cuerpo libere hormonas como renina, aldosterona y angiotensina II para ayudar a retener sodio. Esto aumenta la resistencia a la insulina. • Aumento de hormonas de estrés: Una ingesta baja de sodio eleva los niveles de hormonas de estrés en el cuerpo, como la noradrenalina. Niveles elevados de estas hormonas causan resistencia a la insulina. • Reducción del flujo sanguíneo a los músculos: Una caída en el volumen sanguíneo debido a la restricción de sodio reduce el flujo sanguíneo a los músculos esqueléticos. Esto perjudica la entrega de insulina y glucosa al tejido muscular, empeorando la resistencia a la insulina. • Aumento de los niveles de insulina: El cuerpo responde a la restricción de sal aumentando los niveles de insulina en ayunas como medida compensatoria para retener sodio. Esto es un factor de riesgo para desarrollar diabetes tipo 2. 5 formas en que la resistencia a la insulina causa presión arterial alta: • Retención de sodio y agua: Cuando ocurre la resistencia a la insulina, el páncreas produce insulina en exceso para manejar el azúcar en sangre. Los altos niveles de insulina sobreestimulan los riñones para reabsorber más sodio y agua, lo que aumenta el volumen sanguíneo y eleva la presión arterial. • Disfunción vascular: Una señalización saludable de insulina promueve la producción de óxido nítrico (NO), una molécula que relaja los vasos sanguíneos y mejora el flujo sanguíneo. En un estado de resistencia a la insulina, este proceso se detiene y la presión arterial sube a niveles peligrosos. • Aumento de la actividad del sistema nervioso simpático: Los altos niveles de insulina sobreestimulan el sistema nervioso simpático, que controla la respuesta de "lucha o huida" del cuerpo. Esto aumenta la frecuencia cardíaca, contrae los vasos sanguíneos y activa el sistema SRAA, lo que promueve aún más la retención de sodio y agua. • Inflamación crónica y estrés oxidativo: La resistencia a la insulina causa inflamación crónica de bajo grado y estrés oxidativo en todo el cuerpo. Estos procesos dañan el revestimiento de los vasos sanguíneos (el endotelio). • Endurecimiento vascular: Con el tiempo, la inflamación crónica y otros problemas llevan a una remodelación y endurecimiento arterial. Esto hace que las arterias sean menos flexibles y más resistentes al flujo sanguíneo, obligando al corazón a bombear con más fuerza y elevando la presión arterial. No toda la sal es igual... la sal de mesa es altamente procesada y tóxica. El procesamiento químico de la sal de mesa la despoja de todos los minerales, dejando solo cloruro de sodio aislado. La sal de mesa se blanquea y luego se agregan ingredientes como ferrocianuro de sodio, citrato de amonio, silicato de aluminio, azúcar (dextrosa) y agentes anticompactantes. La sal saludable es sal mineral sin refinar... sal celta o gris sin procesar que retiene todos los más de 80 minerales traza. Busca las que estén libres de microplásticos, metales pesados y contaminantes.

    2.8K1.4K3374109K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20267.0x their median

    🇧🇪🚜 BILDER AUS BRÜSSEL 🚜🇧🇪 Niederländische 🇳🇱 und belgische 🇧🇪 Bauern liefern sich in Brüssel Auseinandersetzungen mit der Polizei. 👮‍♂️💥 🇪🇺🔥 Das Zentrum der EU – für viele der Inbegriff des globalistischen Machtapparats – steht unter dem Druck des wütenden Protests der Landwirte. 🚜😡

    2.4K9111033843K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.8x their median

    La Suisse est devenue le premier pays à interdire la mammographie, révélant ainsi la vérité sur l'une des plus grandes supercheries de l'histoire de la médecine. Pendant des décennies, des femmes ont été terrorisées, mal diagnostiquées et mutilées par un système conçu non pas pour soigner, mais pour faire du profit. Le masque est désormais tombé. La mammographie n'a jamais eu pour but de sauver des vies. Il s'agissait de créer des patientes. Les faits sont accablants : Jusqu'à 60 % de faux positifs – La moitié des diagnostics sont erronés. Des femmes subissent des chimiothérapies, des mastectomies et des radiothérapies pour des maladies qu'elles n'ont jamais eues. L'examen lui-même est dangereux – Les seins sont soumis à une compression brutale, les tissus sont bombardés de radiations. Un « test de dépistage du cancer » qui provoque le cancer. Risque de propagation tumorale – Des études indiquent que la mammographie pourrait en réalité stimuler la croissance des tumeurs. Imaginez croire en un test qui favorise la maladie même qu'il prétend prévenir. Plus de 690.000 surdiagnostics : des femmes en bonne santé ont été déclarées malades et exploitées par l’industrie pharmaceutique. Ce n’est pas ça, les soins de santé. C'est un crime organisé contre les femmes. Une machine à profits bâtie sur la peur, la propagande et les dépistages annuels obligatoires qui piège des millions de personnes dans un cycle de surdiagnostic et de surtraitement. La Suisse est en guerre contre la mafia médicale. Son interdiction n'est pas qu'une simple question politique, c'est un acte révolutionnaire qui révèle le secret honteux du profit au détriment de la santé des patients. Le reste du monde ne peut plus faire semblant. La vérité est simple : des alternatives meilleures et plus sûres existent. Écrasement et radiations ? Non. Les examens manuels et l'imagerie avancée le permettent. L'industrie médicale le sait, mais elle le tait pour préserver son empire de plusieurs milliards de dollars/euros. Appel mondial à l'action : – Arrêter la mammographie dans tous les pays. – Traquer et poursuivre les profiteurs. – Financer des diagnostics humains et sûrs. – Informer les femmes avec la vérité, et non avec une propagande alarmiste. La Suisse a allumé la mèche. Le système médical se battra pour défendre son empire, mais les failles commencent à apparaître. Les mensonges ne tiendront pas. Il ne s'agit pas simplement de dépister le cancer du sein. Il s'agit de dénoncer tout un système qui se nourrit de la souffrance humaine. La Suisse a franchi une première étape vers une véritable révolution des soins de santé. La question est : le monde se soulèvera-t-il ou laissera-t-il la mafia médicale continuer à détruire des vies pour le profit ? Le temps du silence est révolu. La vérité a éclaté.

    1.4K7941234461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.4x their median

    -Müslümanların gündemi boş, gereksiz ve utanç verici sosyal medya tartışmaları ile işgal edilirken -Siyonist israil de Gazze işgaline devam edyor. https://t.co/6jzKGQcFbk

    1.4K800171318K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.2x their median

    Ortalıkta dolaşan haber maalesef doğru değil, Büyük Müslüman lider İmran Khan hala hapiste ve çok hasta. Serbest bırakılması için dünya Müslümanları çalışma yapmalı. Pakistan’ı boydan boya gezmiş birisi olarak söylüyorum, Pakistan çok fakir ve askeri vesayet olarak bizim 12 Eylül dönemini yaşıyor. Mevcut Başkanın Türkiye ‘ye daha yakın olduğunu biliyorum ama İmran Khan kötü bir insan değil, halkını çok seviyor ve ülkesini vesayetten kurtarmak istiyordu.

    1.7K37234965K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.3x their median

    Anyma 12 Eylül'de İstanbul'a geliyor. Bunlar büyü yapacak. Büyü sadece doğaüstü güçlerle yapılan bir şey değildir. Bazen binlerce insanın aynı anda aynı sese, aynı ışığa ve aynı duyguya teslim olmasıdır. Müzik ritüele, sahne mabede, kalabalık tek bir zihne dönüşür. Fakat asıl büyü sahnede yapılmayacak. İnsanların birkaç saatliğine kim olduklarını unutup başka bir bilincin içine girmelerinde olacak. Anyma'nın sanatı zaten insanla makine, doğumla ölüm, yıkımla yeniden doğuş arasındaki sınırı eritiyor. 12 Eylül gecesi İstanbul'da anlatılacak hikaye de bu. Eski beden parçalanacak, eski dünya çökecek ve harabelerin arasından başka biri çıkacak. Bunların konserinden uzak durun.

    1.4K1865315183K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 496 interactions against 945K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 41x its own typical post.

What is Abdurrahman Dilipak's engagement rate on X?
Abdurrahman Dilipak (@aDilipak) has an engagement rate of 0.053%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 944,558 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.053%, Abdurrahman Dilipak sits above the 50th percentile of the 10,985 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @aDilipak have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @aDilipak post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going