Back to @_tomcc's profile

Tommaso Checchi engagement report

@_tomcc - 300K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 300K followers
Per impression
0.295%
4.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.295% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2M interactions, about 94954x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Tommaso Checchi's engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Tommaso Checchi sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 263 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 18, 202294954x their median

    Should I step down as head of Twitter? I will abide by the results of this poll.

    521K207K341K165K367M viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 202028152x their median

    Buffalo protester shoved by Police could be an ANTIFA provocateur. 75 year old Martin Gugino was pushed away after appearing to scan police communications in order to black out the equipment. @OANN I watched, he fell harder than was pushed. Was aiming scanner. Could be a set up?

    118K23K131K94KView on X
  • Sep 12, 20231256x their median

    Today we announced a change to our business model which includes new additions to our subscription plans, and the introduction of a Runtime fee. We wanted to provide clarifying answers to the top questions most of you are asking. Yes, this is a price increase and it will only affect a small subset of current Unity Editor users. Today, a large majority of Unity Editor users are currently not paying anything and will not be affected by this change. The Unity Runtime fee will not impact the majority of our developers. The developers who will be impacted are generally those who have successful games and are generating revenue way above the thresholds we outlined in our blog. This means that developers who are still building their business and growing the audience of their games will not pay a fee. The program was designed specifically this way to ensure developers could find success before the install fee takes effect. We want to be clear that the counter for Unity Runtime fee installs starts on January 1, 2024 - it is not retroactive or perpetual. We will charge once for a new install; not an ongoing perpetual license royalty, like revenue share. We looked for ways to lessen the impact on developers, and provide ways to bring the Runtime fee to zero. If you’re using any of our ad products, Unity Gaming Services or cloud services, etc. please contact us to discuss discounts. We are actively listening to and following your questions closely. Please review our FAQ (https://t.co/YOA8dvVdjO) on today’s announcement. We also invite you to continue to discuss these changes with us on our forums: https://t.co/yG9GW4Hu3z.

    4.2K9725.3K5.9K14M viewsView on X
  • Feb 5, 2023708x their median

    In light of the Hogwarts Legacy leaks, I think we should leave inventory screens with tons of unnecessary slots and sliders behind if we ever wish to progress as a species https://t.co/OTG7rgdQay

    7.7K4943097425.4M viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 2024141x their median

    Here's also our postmortem of 3 years of Rust gamedev, and why we're leaving Rust https://t.co/oA8u7ehLuf #rustgamedev #rustlang

    1.4K2366187582K viewsView on X
  • Jun 11, 2022102x their median

    HOWDY Y'ALL! It's finally here! #DragonDrop has officially dropped onto @Steam in Early Access! If you haven't gotten the chance to try it yet, now's the perfect opportunity! Check it out & review it here: https://t.co/FguPaukxF8 #indiegame #gamedev #indiegames #ゲーム開発 https://t.co/5eKcLFKYO2

    9213491937View on X
  • Jun 18, 2022100x their median

    Btw, I left Minecraft a bit more than a year ago, so I didn't really have much to talk about on here. I do have some projects going on on the side however... maybe there will be gifs one day :)

    1.2K361911View on X
  • Jun 18, 202241x their median

    I read a few replies to my last tweet and it's weird but also super wholesome to be people's childhood memory! But I am not deceased yet, at least.

    5049161View on X
  • Apr 21, 202328x their median

    Can’t wait until Twitter is sold for 97% off to an actually competent company… sucks that we have to wait so long for the train wreck to be complete though

    335225154K viewsView on X
  • Jan 1, 202318x their median

    Now that it's 2023, can people stop recommending GIMP as a Photoshop replacement or nah? Krita is great and open source, Affinity Photo is even better and closed but cheap. GIMP is... not good, and it should stop being people's go to

    1951423123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13 interactions against 300K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.4K times each, and 0.295% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.47% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2M interactions, about 94954x its own typical post.

What is Tommaso Checchi's engagement rate on X?
Tommaso Checchi (@_tomcc) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 300,208 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Tommaso Checchi sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_tomcc have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_tomcc post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going