Back to @_slimarella_'s profile

SLIM 🫧 engagement report

@_slimarella_ - 60K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.162%
of 60K followers
Per impression
3.28%
2.9K views on a typical post
Reach
4.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.306%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 3.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 182x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cancerfree, #manic, #noticing.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #cancerfree, #manic, #noticing.

Compared with accounts its own size

SLIM 🫧's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.162%, SLIM 🫧 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video3% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 3% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 125 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 2026182x their median

    https://t.co/FvkQBwaSQC

    15K1.7K75474437K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202624x their median

    If you have TSA pre check and global entry, do you stay in line with the person that doesn’t have it? lol I do

    1.1K67221926291K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202614x their median

    Taurus get so evil when they don't like you💀😭

    1.0K239158833K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202612x their median

    it’s so draining when you know you’re clearly explaining how you feel while articulating yourself in a way that is understanding and a mf STILL find a way to purposely miss the point.

    86829003621K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202611x their median

    once i realize someone is trying to manipulate a situation & flip the script to make me look like the aggressor i stop engaging. i will not be gaslit into believing how i feel is a problem! mind you, these are my feelings.

    73329301720K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20267.8x their median

    I’d strap a bitch without putting my mouth on her quick, Iont even play like that!

    42512238160236K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.4x their median

    i’m a sucka for romantic gestures. planning dates, random flowers, love notes, quality time, thoughtful gifts occasionally, simply doing something that will make me fall in love over & over again.

    3431670910K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.7x their median

    the lesbian dating pool has shit in it.

    2548451310K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.1x their median

    let’s go back to our exes

    1362721114145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20262.0x their median

    you really cannot sit back trying to make sense of everything. you’ll drive yourself silly!

    12065074.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cancerfree#manic#noticing#realizing

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.162%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 3.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 182x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cancerfree, #manic, #noticing.

What is SLIM 🫧's engagement rate on X?
SLIM 🫧 (@_slimarella_) has an engagement rate of 0.162%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 59,646 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.162%, SLIM 🫧 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_slimarella_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_slimarella_ post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going