Back to @_mario_boss's profile

Mario Boss engagement report

@_mario_boss - 789K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.085%
of 789K followers
Per impression
2.49%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
676
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 676 interactions against 789K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,397 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #cawtbarcelona.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mario Boss's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,397 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.085%, Mario Boss sits above the 25th percentile of the 214,659 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.701%
p902.62%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 214,659 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 21,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.701%
90th percentile2.62%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 95 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 202631x their median

    LLEGANDO A CEUTA https://t.co/3yMp9oi2Fl

    14K2.5K3.1K9954.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202624x their median

    Bueno pues os dejo un cacho del espectáculo PORNOGRÁFICO que acabo de vivir con mis hijas Carlota y Fabiana, de 4 y 6 años respectivamente, en el concierto de Aitana esta noche en Barcelona. De verdad es necesario hacer estos “bailes” en un concierto para niños? #CAWTBarcelona https://t.co/t32nr8QmMG

    12K3493.3K6476.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 202618x their median

    🇫🇷 DÉBAT – Êtes-vous pour ou contre l’éclipse solaire ? https://t.co/zehWrxI3ik

    10K4768775521.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202615x their median

    Cuando dentro de 15 años el termómetro marque 52 grados, supongo que los negacionistas del cambio climático seguirán diciendo que siempre ha hecho calor en agosto, mientras se les derriten las persianas y los cojonazos.

    8.1K1.1K82771216K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202614x their median

    Juan Carlos Rivero saludando a sus sobrinos en directo. Es bastante probable que no se llamen así.

    9.1K5373018223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202613x their median

    No miréis directamente el precio de la gasolina.

    7.3K1.6K3128115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202611x their median

    Litronas Porros Y a follar https://t.co/DsuubpLxu3

    5.1K5811.4K362613K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20268.8x their median

    Quién en su sano juicio no va a hacer caso a un cantante drogadicto y a un lateral derecho cuando hablan de astronomía.

    5.3K651285144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.7x their median

    A ver qué vestido se pone la Pedroche para el eclipse.

    4.7K50722277K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20266.6x their median

    Habría que crear una plataforma donde los trabajadores podiéramos dejar reseñas de las empresas. Una especie de JobAdvisor: “El café es gratis. Lo vas a necesitar para soportar el resto de condiciones”.

    4.0K3579417137K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cawtbarcelona

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 676 interactions against 789K followers, an engagement rate of 0.085%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,397 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 31x its own typical post.

What is Mario Boss's engagement rate on X?
Mario Boss (@_mario_boss) has an engagement rate of 0.085%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 789,375 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.085%, Mario Boss sits above the 25th percentile of the 214,659 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_mario_boss have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,397 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_mario_boss post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going