AK engagement report
@_akhaliq - 536K followers on X
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.646% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 791 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
AK's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.021%, AK sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 120 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 11, 20246.9x their median
for daily papers, authors can directly submit them here: https://t.co/gwjqMBKVg0
- Aug 31, 20266.7x their median
Apparently the peak of ROBOTICS in 2026 is a $399 duck on roller skates. Microduck pre-orders topped $2.6M in 24 hours. Now there’s a 4–6 month backlog. Not a humanoid. Not a warehouse robot. A duck. That’s where the joke gets inconvenient. Microduck is from Pollen Robotics, now part of Hugging Face. The duck is 25 cm tall, weighs under 800 g and ships with seven trained behaviors. You can teach it new ones and upload them for other people to use. For years robotics has been showing us expensive machines doing impressive things behind ropes, inside factories or in suspiciously perfect demos. Then someone puts a beak on a small robot, charges $399 and suddenly people want one in the house. I laughed at it first. Then I got annoyed that THIS might actually be what cracks consumer robotics. Then I started thinking about what I would teach it. That may be the whole point. People buy the toy, teach it something stupid, upload the behavior, copy what someone else made, and suddenly a lot of people are tinkering with real robots at home. Necessary? Absolutely not. Do I want one? Annoyingly, yes. Maybe robotics does not enter the home when robots become essential. Maybe it enters when they become impossible to resist.
- Oct 14, 20265.3x their median
VideoJev System One Model for Video Understanding and Interaction paper: https://t.co/JtkDu1fSJb https://t.co/FJguUPKuwB
- Sep 9, 20262.3x their median
Marigold V2 Revisiting Diffusion Transformers for Monocular Depth Estimation paper: https://t.co/718T7p8wCZ https://t.co/MJTvHC9jCt
- Aug 26, 20261.9x their median
github actions aren't working, it says we're having billing problems but there are no billing problems how fix
- Aug 24, 20261.8x their median
Learning How the World Evolves Extrapolative Video World Models via Latent Dynamics Reasoning paper: https://t.co/3ZZNem8VKg https://t.co/oJLnoUkQ0U
- Oct 12, 20261.8x their median
BudgetPix Compute-Adaptive Tokenization for Pixel-Space Image Diffusion paper: https://t.co/1nHZfWMeWq https://t.co/aXfvKb3LUS
- Oct 16, 20261.6x their median
Hybrid Reasoning Agents paper: https://t.co/L6Tmk4Oy2q https://t.co/pdWodo7q2R
- Aug 31, 20261.6x their median
Code as Worlds Agentic Discovery of Executable World Representations for Physical Reasoning paper: https://t.co/b9FTr6cfqu https://t.co/CEd2ySybb8
- Sep 1, 2026
Does On-Policy Distillation Really Distill? From Noisy Teacher to Self-Improvement paper: https://t.co/M1O5lsPfkG https://t.co/DOrjdFUspF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 536K followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.646% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 791 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.
- What is AK's engagement rate on X?
- AK (@_akhaliq) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 536,184 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.021%, AK sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @_akhaliq have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @_akhaliq post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.