Back to @_Pammy_DS_'s profile

š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø engagement report

@_Pammy_DS_ - 374K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.237%
of 374K followers
Per impression
2.56%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
9.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
888
interactions (median)
Saved
0.216%
75 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 888 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.237%, š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Mar 5, 202327x their median

    So in love with sunsets. https://t.co/cHfZl9IzAD

    19K3.7K9542403.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.8x their median

    Removing yourself from situations that repeatedly trigger your mental health, hurt your heart, or disturb your soul is top-tier selfcare.

    4.0K1.1K493199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.0x their median

    A soul-to-soul connection is worth the wait. Soulmates aren't just romantic, they're friends too. Your soulmates will recognize you, befriend you, support you, love you, heal with you, and grow with you. They perfectly align with your inner child energy and your old soul.

    2.9K565343363K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.3x their median

    Always trust your gut. When your intuition says something is off about a situation, person, or place — trust it and remove yourself.

    2.4K521282561K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.2x their median

    I promise you, someone rejecting you is actually the universe protecting you — trust those divine redirections.

    2.5K336331254K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20263.1x their median

    Manipulators always blame you for your reaction to their toxic behaviour, but don't ever discuss their disrespect that triggered you.

    2.0K662382572K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.9x their median

    Life humbles you. The more you mature, the more you crave a calm life and the less you tolerate conflict, drama, and chaos. You just want a loving, peaceful home, good food on your table, and to be surrounded by your favourite people.

    1.9K602351061K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.5x their median

    Unhealed trauma makes you hold onto people and tolerate a lot of shit you don't deserve because you don't want to lose them and be alone. Healing helps you realize some people don't deserve to be in your life — no matter how much you love them.

    1.8K410321163K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.5x their median

    Most relationships taught me that the more chances you give somebody, the less they value you. They aren't afraid to lose you bcoz they know no matter what, you won't walk away. Be bold with your boundaries, stand on your standards, and start choosing distance over disrespect.

    1.8K387241154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.4x their median

    Normalize never forcing people to pick you. If they think they can find better elsewhere – Iet them. Respectfully.

    1.7K399301653K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 888 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.237%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 24K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø's engagement rate on X?
š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø (@_Pammy_DS_) has an engagement rate of 0.237%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 374,178 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.237%, š™‹š™–š™¢š™¢š™® āœØļø sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_Pammy_DS_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_Pammy_DS_ post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going