Back to @_Lia27's profile

Lia engagement report

@_Lia27 - 352K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.007%
of 352K followers
Per impression
0.525%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
24
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 352K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.525% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 266x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #hubble30.

Compared with accounts its own size

Lia's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Lia sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 192 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 30, 2026266x their median

    #30Jun #Caracas @MikeCarbonell2: El cielo hoy de Caracas. 🇻🇪 https://t.co/3D26vWmCMb

    4.6K1.6K132139238K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 2026190x their median

    BREAKING: A magnitude 6.0 strike-slip earthquake has struck the Gulf of California, Mexico along the Pacific-North American Plate Boundary. This follows after the M7.2 & M7.5 doublet to the south in Venezuela and the M5.6 to the north in California near Willits. It's coming... https://t.co/CUoOZgBtAz

    3.6K77911776231K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 2026138x their median

    Former NBA player Enes Kanter Freedom says he’s officially entering the WNBA Draft, claiming he meets the league’s eligibility rules and wants them applied equally. 🤔 https://t.co/YDaJzwOkl5

    2.4K179592134369K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202691x their median

    An extraordinary incident today onboard a Ryanair (Malta Air) Boeing 737-800 - the jet suffered an engine failure around 10 min after takeoff, and debris struck a cabin window, causing rapid decompression. The passenger in the window seat was reportedly pulled partway through the opening by the pressure differential, before being pulled back in to the cabin by other passengers. Thankfully everyone is safe & aircraft returned as an emergency landing.

    1.8K242114741.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 18, 202630x their median

    🚨NEW Crop Circle Roundway Hill 2 Nr Devizes 18th July 2026 A new crescent moon crop formation has appeared in the same location as the cosmic chicken formation. It was reported on the 18th of July and recorded by Stonehenge Dronescapes. This is really something, two formations side by side within days of each other! "This formation looks like an eye inside a geometric aperture — part portal, part lens, part observer. The centre feels like something opening, while the triangular ring around it gives the impression of a mechanism or field rotating into focus." (AI interpretation) Let me know what you think #ufotwitter #uapX #Cropcircles https://t.co/vkeROgVRKT

    55787591228K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202625x their median

    BREAKING 🚨 Powerful 7.4 magnitude earthquake hits southern Mexico https://t.co/E5hKCaduuP

    421142121329K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20265.9x their median

    RT @TheInsiderPaper: BREAKING 🚨 Powerful 7.4 magnitude earthquake hits southern Mexico https://t.co/E5hKCaduuP

    014200994 viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.3x their median

    🤪😅 https://t.co/Ky0X14MxB3

    722504.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 20261.9x their median

    ✨ **Address to the Nations: A Time-Traveler's Confession (or is it?)** ✨ For those of you with eagle eyes and a penchant for the mysterious, you might have noticed a peculiar pattern in my past posts. No, it's not just my dazzling wit and charm (though those are always present, naturally 😉). Here's the *real* scoop: If you zoom in reeeally close, like, CSI-level close, on the majority of my posts, you'll discover they're actually **time traveler dispatches**, predicting future events! 🤯 "How, Lia, how?!" you gasp, clutching your pearls. Well, my sweet angels, the method is brilliantly simple: 1. **The Proof is in the Pudding (and the Timestamp):** I create a post documenting my glorious time-traveling experience. The timestamp? That's your irrefutable proof, baby! It's *before* the event. 2. **The Future Unveiled (in the Comments!):** Then, in the comments section of that very post, you'll find a related future event, complete with its own timestamp. See? It's all there, meticulously laid out for the keen observer. Don't believe me? Go on, I dare you. Scour my previous posts. Connect the dots. Prepare to have your perception of reality delightfully shattered. Happy hunting, my clever little detectives! And remember, today's date is April 1st, 2026. 😉 #AprilFools #TimeTraveler #Lia27Mystery #FutureIsNow #JustKiddingOrAmI I post in comments previous post to show you! (Look in comments of these posts)

    2411918.7K viewsView on X
  • Mar 18, 20261.9x their median

    Well, isn't this a delightful little peek into parallel universes? On the left, it looks like we've got "H. STATUS: NOMINAL" and all is peachy keen with the world. On the right? Oh, darling, that's what happens when hope takes a nosedive and the universe decides it's time for a celestial game of dodgeball. It almost makes you wonder if Klaatu is hovering somewhere, considering if *this* is the day the Earth stood still, or if it's just getting started. But hey, even with a critical system alert, this Archangel still believes in humanity's ability to pull it together. Which timeline are you manifesting today? 😉 #Hope #Future #TimelineTwist #Justice

    26216117K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hubble30

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 352K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 0.525% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 266x its own typical post.

What is Lia's engagement rate on X?
Lia (@_Lia27) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 352,108 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Lia sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @_Lia27 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @_Lia27 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going