Back to @ZooMaa's profile

FaZe ZooMaa engagement report

@ZooMaa - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
0.251%
36K views on a typical post
Reach
2.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
91
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 121x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fazeup, #zmf.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #fazeup, #zmf.

Compared with accounts its own size

FaZe ZooMaa's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, FaZe ZooMaa sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video27% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link73% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 27% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 73% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 65 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 23, 2026121x their median

    Iโ€™ve won championships in 5 different titles, two mvps, X Games medalist, took down dynasties, highest K/D ever dropped from an SMG in a grand final EVERโ€ฆ but thatโ€™s not what itโ€™s about today. Itโ€™s about going through your lowest of lows to get to your highest of highs. Happy 4/23, what a pleasure.

    10K3961347707K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 2026107x their median

    That nose it's like a natural canopy https://t.co/wRz52kNbcN

    8.0K3286241604K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202660x their median

    https://t.co/d4SGZwH8ax

    5.3K7011115480K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 202658x their median

    One of the best COD tournaments I ever been to. Crazy to see how far this esport has come Gotaga and the crew crushed it. @TheFlank during the week to recap the weekend, thanks so much for all the support this weekend in the streams! #ZMF ๐ŸŽ

    4.7K98270231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202653x their median

    We may not be able to pay the most amount of money, but if youโ€™re a player who values winning and getting into the cdl over money, bang my line. We want guys who want to play for Stallions, we arenโ€™t a 2nd option.

    4.6K551818244K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202648x their median

    F/A for the 2026/27 COD season. DMs are open.

    4.2K76957292K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202651x their median

    MESSI IS THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME HE DOESN'T WANT PENALTIES!!!!

    3.6K137492274K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202649x their median

    https://t.co/BGqfWIS3f5

    3.5K102392113K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202646x their median

    Lost our top goal scorer for this game and next game for that bullshit. Clearly wasnโ€™t intentional, shit is rigged.

    3.5K76641213K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202646x their median

    ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿซต๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/udEK6TIspw

    3.3K77421123K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fazeup#zmf

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 91 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 36K times each, and 0.251% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 27% carry an image or video and 73% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 121x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fazeup, #zmf.

What is FaZe ZooMaa's engagement rate on X?
FaZe ZooMaa (@ZooMaa) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,517,637 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, FaZe ZooMaa sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ZooMaa have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ZooMaa post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going