Back to @ZmeenaO's profile

ZmeenaOrr engagement report

@ZmeenaO - 960K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 960K followers
Per impression
0.076%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
2.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20
interactions (median)
Saved
0.004%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 960K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.076% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 606x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ZmeenaOrr's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, ZmeenaOrr sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link74% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 74% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 62 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 2026606x their median

    Caution ⚠️ SLIPPERY WHILE WET πŸ’¦πŸ’¦ https://t.co/9hPiGUjpZD

    11K1.2K867120K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026499x their median

    Describe me using 1 word πŸ˜‰ https://t.co/dvNsTLnxqm

    8.7K1.0K26013126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026491x their median

    Juicy πŸ‘πŸ’¦ https://t.co/EnnlSqkxym

    8.7K1.0K5811111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026470x their median

    What would you do if you caught me laying in the bed like this? πŸ˜˜πŸ˜‰ https://t.co/NRGl5D0l4A

    8.3K89617113122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026454x their median

    Who can bend me over and handle thisπŸ‘€ https://t.co/TlWYHZawdo

    8.4K5571099125K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026401x their median

    Juicy πŸ‘ https://t.co/QEBOxf0obE

    7.1K774919100K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026385x their median

    Could you handle me on top? πŸ₯΅πŸ˜˜ https://t.co/0gHjmhfKuC

    6.8K7971340130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026380x their median

    Sorry, did I distract youπŸ€·β€β™€οΈ πŸ”—Link in Bio. https://t.co/RraVljsnXm

    7.0K572591074K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026366x their median

    Would you have sex on a balcony?πŸ‘€ https://t.co/rSIQ5MDhT3

    6.7K4261651059K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026360x their median

    Would you last?πŸ‘ https://t.co/yUCX8fyKwt

    6.7K437897102K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 960K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.076% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 74% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 606x its own typical post.

What is ZmeenaOrr's engagement rate on X?
ZmeenaOrr (@ZmeenaO) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 960,258 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, ZmeenaOrr sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ZmeenaO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ZmeenaO post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going