Back to @Zeneca's profile

Zenecađź”® engagement report

@Zeneca - 395K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 395K followers
Per impression
1.44%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
4.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
253
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.33/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Zenecađź”®'s engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Zenecađź”® sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,991 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video32% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 411 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 27, 20259.9x their median

    uhhh this is kind of an insane airdrop wtf https://t.co/8aEvyElw1i

    2.1K6629320701K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.3x their median

    $RSGP is coming in August. To celebrate, we're airdropping Loot Chests containing $RSGP to everyone in the community who's stuck around in the bear market. We want YOU involved. You have 14 days to claim. https://t.co/TALxNn98oI

    1.0K227156159517K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.2x their median

    $8 @jackbutcher credits going for $124 now. casual 15.5x for nft enjoyooors. https://t.co/0Pg9Duzn6J

    907311151470K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20264.1x their median

    The "chosen" altcoins of the cycle: - $ZEC @ $1,580 - $VVV @ $30 - $NEAR @ $5.20 - $HYPE & $LIT @ $91 & $4.60 What am I missing?

    7083028120202K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.6x their median

    you need to read this. it is near impossible to convince many of you to be bullish on crypto, and it really shouldn’t be this difficult I hate to break it to you but some of you are just never gonna make it, and here’s why: as Bitcoin sold off -50%, and alts sold off -99%, you watched: - Gold add 15 Trillion to its mcap in a few months - Oil trade like a Solana memecoin - AI stocks bubble 20x in a few months - and you joined crypto in the first place because of the sheer possibility for even absolute ponzis to see 5b+ valuations depending on how long you’ve been here, you’ve then watched the exact premise as to WHY you’re here play out before your eyes, dozens, or even hundreds of times. yet you’re ready to throw in the towel on crypto because BTC is consolidating after moving +30% off the lows and a handful of alts have seen 100% rallies after downtrending for a year I am so sorry if your favorite influencer told you to “buy the dip” on Popcat 87 times during that period, and recently shilled you an unfunny meme on Robinhood chain that went to 0, and as a result you’ve forgotten how to dream but you’re compounding realized losses from prolonged periods of underperformance with intangible losses in the form of opportunity cost there is absolutely no point in suffering through a bear market if you’re not going to be a believer when the market begins making higher highs for the first time in a year this is why many of you will simply never make it because whether the market decides to rip higher now, or in 5 years, you will always find yourself on the side of the disbelievers so maybe reconsider your position. goodluck.

    79068431245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.5x their median

    learn how to be happy when you have no money then when you have money you’ll have already known how to be happy no need to wait to start

    724381041736K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.2x their median

    Ty to the mutuals who’ve hopped on board @TheGodPull train. Attempting something new and fun for the sake of seeing something new and fun. Publicly available information: - drop is 27th of this month on @opensea - supply is 11,111 - mint is free for @Deadfellaz - affordable for everyone else - omens will be available on multiple chains with a combo of mechanics we haven’t seen yet, playing with the royalties dynamic between creator and collector. Stay tuned for more on this. - god list collabs have mostly gone out, wallet checker will be live shortly. - website is live https://t.co/93DrkUCalk

    503362531538K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.1x their median

    if u make life-changing money, please make sure to take profits and realise it i get the concept of "it's early in the cycle things can go a lot higher" but compared to previous cycles and due to AI advancements, i think the concept of defining the "cycle winner" early in the cycle and successfully holding it all the way thru is materially more risky than it ever has been worst thing u can do is roundtrip 7 figs at the beginning of the cycle (or lose money) and then not have enough capital to play the even bigger narratives when they come ppl often confuse the encouragement of taking profit for being bearish - that's not the case, you can be bullish but still take out initials and profits while still leaving good meat on the table to ride higher my hunch is we'll see a lot of round-tripping before things properly get going - moreso than ever before (and it has already started tbf)

    66334661885K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.0x their median

    12h34m56s left to mint this years Bold Open Edition. 0.01E to mint and the site uses @RelayProtocol so you can use anything from @ethereum to @solana! Massive thank you to everyone who has minted so far 🙏 (link below) https://t.co/2sjUECikv8

    59043892779K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.2x their median

    If you really want NFTs to come back, start being vocal about them on the timeline. Be proud of yourself for sticking to your roots. There is no better feeling than buying NFTs. There is no second best. Ily.

    385201173465K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 253 interactions against 395K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 9.9x its own typical post.

What is Zenecađź”®'s engagement rate on X?
Zenecađź”® (@Zeneca) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 394,708 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Zenecađź”® sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Zeneca have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Zeneca post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going