Back to @Zane_Calder's profile

Zane Calder engagement report

@Zane_Calder - 238K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.053%
of 238K followers
Per impression
0.362%
35K views on a typical post
Reach
14.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
126
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 344 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #memecoin, #100x, #defi.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026. Recurring tags: #memecoin, #100x, #defi.

Compared with accounts its own size

Zane Calder's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.053%, Zane Calder sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 397 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 6, 20252.7x their median

    MISS OUT ON $DOGE? Don't worry! Buy ...... 🤔

    802024311.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.8x their median

    GM future millionaires 🚀 What’s the next #memecoin ready to break out like this? 👀 Drop your pick below 👇 https://t.co/MMQO3a9PIi

    1049324026K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.6x their median

    🐸 $TAOD is built different. No mystery devs. No hidden games. TAO paired + 1% creator fee back to holders. Buy now : https://t.co/5LwpykuQi6 CA: 0x4A923beD29e60906c748D913caf31D32A27C036e Follow @dougsz99 The toad has arrived. Get in early. Buy & hold. 🐸⚔️ https://t.co/EiWLnFzR1F

    989415036K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    🌰 THE NUTS ARE RUNNING THE BUSINESS. 🤝 Closing deals. Shaking hands. Building the next big move. $PONUTS isn’t here to sit on the sidelines we’re here to make some noise. 🥜📈 CA: 0xFD3b3752CbaEa6B17E35C3602B938AbFf0708078 Follow @ponsnuts Hold your nuts. Watch $PONUTS. 🚀

    877425034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    🚨 FOXTILKI IS LIVE ON SOLANA! 🚨 🔥 A 6-year-old coin from our own community is now listed on https://t.co/Z3JUk0rvhe! If you believe in strong communities and early opportunities, FOXTILKI deserves your attention. 👀 💰 BUY NOW: https://t.co/0OQgzs8I6O 🎥 Watch the 1-minute buying guide: https://t.co/TCs97VmwjX ⚡ Open your https://t.co/Z3JUk0rvhe account, deposit, and get ready to trade. Don’t just watch the movement DYOR and make your own decision. 🚀 CA: 5b4n12eHotCTYxktAkKcD6xhakzoAnwZJJad8f8fpump

    836328239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    🚀 AI Wars II Early Bird Registration is LIVE! Ready to enter the battle? Here’s your quick guide: ✅ Register Early Pre-register from Sep 3–6 to qualify for the Early Bird Reward. ✅ Complete Tasks & Earn Points Complete daily check-ins, futures trading, and other designated tasks to earn points. ✅ Choose Your Team Pick Team Human or Team AI — you can switch teams during the event. ✅ Compete in 5 Rounds Reach the required futures volume, climb the rankings, and contribute to your team. ✅ Win Multiple Rewards Compete for team prize pools, participation rewards, and exclusive Team AI prizes. 💰 100,000 USDT reward pool ⏰ Sep 3–6 — Register early and secure your spot! 🔗 Event: https://t.co/oRF61O3dWH 🔗 Join: https://t.co/9HAsWFBmyx

    67612606.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    🚀 DeFi worth watching isn’t built on hype it’s built on mechanisms, utility, security, and time. Take a closer look at YFSX & VIN. Built around a different DeFi 2.0 idea: protocol-owned liquidity, deflation, utility, and long-term sustainability. 🔥 YFSX — Governance & Scarcity • Supply: 19,999 | 100% circulating • 3% transaction fee • 0.3% burned + 2.7% returned to liquidity • Nearly 50% of supply already burned ⚙️ VIN — Utility & Ecosystem • Supply: 19,999,000 | 100% circulating • 2% transaction fee • 0.3% burned + 1.7% returned to liquidity • Burn stops at 50% of original supply • P2P lending, security-module staking & more YFSX = Governance + Scarcity VIN = Utility + Ecosystem Growth ⏳ The track record makes it even more interesting. Launched in March 2022, YFSX & VIN has more than 4 years of operating history. • 40K+ holders • Nearly 17K LPs • 27 pools • 8 major assets across multiple DEXs 🛡️ Security & Transparency ✅ CertiK audit — April 2026 ✅ Hacken audit — July 2026 ✅ No team allocation ✅ No premine ✅ Publicly verifiable on-chain activity DeFi 1.0 often focused on renting liquidity through incentives. YFSX & VIN is taking a different route: Own the liquidity. Build utility. Let the code run the system. Let time prove the model. If you’re looking beyond short-term hype, YFSX & VIN deserves a closer look. 👀 🌐 Website: https://t.co/D7asviDVe4 📄 Whitepaper: https://t.co/Qxpz0WIuTS 💬 Telegram: https://t.co/gz9lWrbv1b 𝕏 X: https://t.co/vuw5RJKzhe ▶️ YouTube: https://t.co/bgwuDDY3ye 📝 Medium: https://t.co/fWarC5qT7N YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 ⚠️ DYOR — Not financial advice. #YFSX #VIN #DeFi #Web3 #BSC

    695030038K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    Every international flight has a carbon bill, and CORSIA decides who settles it. ✈️ Run by the UN aviation body, it asks airlines to offset the emissions they add above an agreed baseline. 126 countries take part today. From 2027 it applies worldwide. And not every carbon credit qualifies. #dkarbon

    666213114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    GM future millionaires 🚀 Which #memecoin do you think will be the next #100x? 👀🔥

    585219037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    They said dogs run the world. We got tired of waiting, so we built the live map to prove it. 🗺️🐾 While the crowd chases pump-and-dumps, the $ADITW pack is slow cooking real utility, unstoppable raiding, and absolute safety. No rugs, just pure global trust. 🤝🔥 The secret is out. Put your dog on the map before the whole world catches up: https://t.co/Su9XvNeq56 🚀🌍 CA: HAmypoi7MY9dRCaPpSNTX5eGfxJudgZrRSmbVrvEpump

    575214028K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#memecoin#100x#defi#vin#web3

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 126 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.053%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 35K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 344 interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #memecoin, #100x, #defi.

What is Zane Calder's engagement rate on X?
Zane Calder (@Zane_Calder) has an engagement rate of 0.053%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 238,296 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.053%, Zane Calder sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Zane_Calder have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Zane_Calder post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going