Back to @ZamHaberAjans's profile

ZAM Haber engagement report

@ZamHaberAjans - 884K followers on X

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 884K followers
Per impression
0.195%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
1.47%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
25
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.23/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 884K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.195% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 976 interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ZAM Haber's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, ZAM Haber sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202639x their median

    Bir genç Çin’de içecek yanında ücretsiz verilen termal çantanın işlevselliğini ve dayanıklılığını paylaştı https://t.co/RTokDJdcMt

    9191414292.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202631x their median

    Geçirdiği hastalık sonrası bacakları kesilen 7 yaşındaki Yahya için ailesinin protez arayışına Sedat Peker destek verdi. Van’da inşaat işçisi olarak çalışan babasının karşılayamadığı protezler temin edilerek Yahya’ya ulaştırıldı: 🔹 “Sizin sayenizde Yahya’mız yeniden adım atabilme şansı buldu, yarınlara umutla bakacak.” 🔹 Yahya: “Reisim Sedat Peker, senin sayende arkadaşlarımla oyun oynayacağım, okula gideceğim.” 🔹“Sedat Peker, seni çok seviyorum.”

    511801642240K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202628x their median

    39 yaşında, 2 çocuk annesi. Helen Wood genç görünümüyle sosyal medyada gündem oldu: https://t.co/Fey6c6hST6

    6855180145K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202627x their median

    Burak Özçivit’in kız kardeşi evlendi. Gelin saolna babasının kolunda girdi: 🔹Düğüne Fahriye Evcen’in ve Burak Özçivit’in katılmaması dikkat çekti. https://t.co/8Xbnf70gyk

    6258476421K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202621x their median

    Altınoluk sahilinde genç bir kızın gizlice fotoğrafını çeken bir sapık, genç kız tarafından sosyal medyada ifşa edildi: 🔹 “Bu adam var ya, bu adam benim videomu çekti, fotoğrafımı çekti. Ben görünce eli ayağı birbirine girdi.” 🔹 “Kendimi savunamayacağımı mı düşünüyorsun?” 🟧 “Özür dilerim.” (sondakikaedremit)

    40856445178K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202619x their median

    Perküsyon sanatçısı Ceren Özdemir, gittiği restaurantta fonda çalan şarkıya bardağa vurarak böyle eşlik etti: https://t.co/m1A3nBbmrH

    320281631.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202615x their median

    Köyden satın aldığı eski bir evi tamamen yenileyen bir içerik üreticisi, ortaya çıkan değişimle sosyal medyada beğeni topladı: https://t.co/50gRGwlck7

    357134044K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202611x their median

    Onlarca yeni kıyafeti olmasına rağmen sürekli aynı tişörtü giyen eşine sinirlenen kadın, çareyi tişörtü kesmekte buldu. “Başka üstün yok sanıyorlar, elaleme rezil oluyoruz” diyerek isyan eden kadının o anları sosyal medyada gündem oldu. https://t.co/w36Jx3H8jQ

    243819551K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20268.5x their median

    İstanbul’da dün gece yağan yağmur https://t.co/wwn50Ux6HE

    20921019K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.4x their median

    Bir vatandaş, aldığı trileçenin kutuyla birlikte tartıldığını fark ederek oluşan fiyat farkını paylaştı: 🔹 “Ben dedim ki, ‘Bu kabı da tartıyor musunuz siz?’” 🔹 “İsterseniz darayı düşeyim, dedi.” 🔹 “Darayı düşünce 82 TL tuttu. İlk başta kutusuyla birlikte 95,74 TL çıkmıştı.” 🔹 “Ben uyarmasaydım kutuya da para verecektim.” 🔹 “50 kişi alsa 13 TL’den 650 TL yapar. Aya vurduğunda yaklaşık 20 bin TL.”

    188157165K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 25 interactions against 884K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.195% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.45% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 976 interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

What is ZAM Haber's engagement rate on X?
ZAM Haber (@ZamHaberAjans) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 111 original posts from the last 30 days against 883,932 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, ZAM Haber sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ZamHaberAjans have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ZamHaberAjans post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going