Back to @ZEER0HOUR's profile

0HOUR1 engagement report

@ZEER0HOUR - 371K followers on X

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.06%
of 371K followers
Per impression
2.38%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
222
interactions (median)
Saved
0.011%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.3/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 2.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 124x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maga, #newprofilepic.

Measured over 91 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #maga, #newprofilepic.

Compared with accounts its own size

0HOUR1's engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 72% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.06%, 0HOUR1 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 126 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 2026124x their median

    They printed $9 trillion, gave you $1400 in stimmy checks, sent the rest to their NGOs and campaign donors and left you with the inflation. https://t.co/IqdFEJOUF5

    23K4.2K405243347K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202647x their median

    EXCLUSIVE The man who rear-ended a vehicle while drunk, causing it to crash into a SCHOOL BUS FULL OF CHILDREN in Kentucky, is an ILLEGAL ALIEN FROM GUATEMALA, DHS confirmed to me. Ervin Oxlaj-Perez was released into our country by the Biden admin in 2023. Police said Oxlaj-Perez fled after the crash and was found a block away slurring his words and smelling of alcohol. He is charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, 24 counts of wanton endangerment, no operator's license, and leaving the scene of an accident/failure to render aid. We shouldn’t have to live like this!

    7.3K2.7K24589129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202637x their median

    Muslims all over the world are celebrating 911 like it’s a holiday. Why do we even fuck with these people?

    7.7K422971342K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202634x their median

    BREAKING: The jury has found Duane "Keffe D" Davis guilty in the murder of Tupac Shakur. https://t.co/DP3Fi4V5UD https://t.co/EJJU7cSeEf

    4.7K1.9K261515581K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202633x their median

    Lets talk about Trump Trump has been blocked by the GOP in the Senate way to many times. Trump would have a stronger economy if morons would fall in line. The problem is not Trump its the idiots that walk the halls of congress.

    6.1K1.0K1593433K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202628x their median

    Trump Praises ‘Great Republican Strategist’ Laura Loomer: ‘A Killer’ Thank you, President Trump @POTUS! It has always been an honor to stand with you in your fight to Make America Great Again. 🇺🇸 https://t.co/rZBnKhxsVn

    5.3K7162451569K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202624x their median

    Hung jury figured that would be the verdict Lindsay Clancy walked because women now think it’s ok to abort kids after birth now. Choose who you marry wisely If she’s a liberal walk away fast matter of fact run.

    4.9K40256435K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202624x their median

    Alexandria Cortez, laughing at the 911 Memorial isn’t she a nice fucking lady what a fucking loser https://t.co/n6RYtphl5Z

    4.7K49977825K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202620x their median

    Ohh today the judge rules on the murderer of Charlie Kirk. Big day for the Kirks Be kind

    4.2K11616229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202619x their median

    Brace yourselves for millennials and Gen Z to lie about where they were on 9/11. They were in diapers they don’t know shit. https://t.co/d1zzaJQJBl

    3.3K1248082654K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#maga#newprofilepic

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 222 interactions against 371K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 91 original posts, its engagement rate beats 62% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 2.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 91 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 124x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #maga, #newprofilepic.

What is 0HOUR1's engagement rate on X?
0HOUR1 (@ZEER0HOUR) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 91 original posts from the last 30 days against 370,999 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.06%, 0HOUR1 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ZEER0HOUR have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 62% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ZEER0HOUR post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going