Back to @YourAnonNews's profile

Anonymous engagement report

@YourAnonNews - 7.5M followers on X

Measured over 270 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.024%
of 7.5M followers
Per impression
1.79%
101K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
13.03/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 7.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 270 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 270 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 255K interactions, about 141x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #anonymous, #acab, #anom.

Measured over 270 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #anonymous, #acab, #anom.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anonymous's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.024%, Anonymous sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link8% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 4, 2026141x their median

    Lmao holy shit https://t.co/bcoTea4GLu

    239K14K8331.0K6.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202662x their median

    https://t.co/ToZHdbSK3E

    87K9.3K14K2.9K12M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202655x their median

    Seen in Georgia. He did that. https://t.co/6KEuImxOm3

    89K10K4751561.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202652x their median

    Conservative Inc influencers after the group chat sends out the new talking points: https://t.co/5X9716p0x8

    76K12K3.4K2.8K18M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202645x their median

    MAGA, you owe me an apology. https://t.co/fWq4h2gNb0

    65K5.8K10K1.3K14M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202645x their median

    Damn I’m in such a tough spot. I really want to say that it’s wrong to kill children but I don’t want to upset my agent Josh Childkiller

    74K6.7K8035753K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202633x their median

    Ed Sheeran’s booking agent, Casey Wasserman, was very close with Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. He is also mentioned in the Epstein files more than 109 times. https://t.co/4SSxHCT5f5

    46K12K365317509K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202628x their median

    Tim pool RAGEQUITS when he’s called out for grifting https://t.co/bAJYW7TdwL

    45K2.3K2.1K5986.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202627x their median

    This is a rare photo of Donald Trump from 1934, helping Albert Einstein finish the theory of relativity. According to Trump, Einstein had been stuck for weeks. “Very smart guy. Terrible with numbers. I looked at the board and said, Albert, put a little 2 up there. He loved it." https://t.co/GHhh3Y7gUh

    40K7.0K1.1K7321.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 202626x their median

    https://t.co/C8bKVqsSpE

    38K8.0K92115342K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#anonymous#acab#anom#blocuslycees#goldenshowers4maga

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 7.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.024%. Measured over 270 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 101K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 13 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 270 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 255K interactions, about 141x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #anonymous, #acab, #anom.

What is Anonymous's engagement rate on X?
Anonymous (@YourAnonNews) has an engagement rate of 0.024%, based on the median interactions across 270 original posts from the last 30 days against 7,503,554 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.024%, Anonymous sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @YourAnonNews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @YourAnonNews post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 13.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going