Anonymous engagement report
@YourAnonCentral - 5.2M followers on X
Measured over 223 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 858 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 223 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 113K times each, and 0.762% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 223 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #opdeatheaters, #bindingchaos.
Measured over 223 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #cdnpoli, #opdeatheaters, #bindingchaos.
Compared with accounts its own size
Anonymous's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.016%, Anonymous sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.435% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 54K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 79K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 87K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 95K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 98K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 99K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 75K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 58K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 232K |
| Monday | 0% | 290K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 281K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 252K |
| Thursday | -2% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 254K |
| Saturday | +3% | 228K |
Best tweets
- Aug 24, 202697x their median
Spiderman vs MAGA in Minneapolis. https://t.co/dl4nfsU989
- Aug 22, 202679x their median
My statement on Canada-U.S. trade negotiations: https://t.co/65OuQH40ra
- Aug 21, 202632x their median
Liev Schreiber: "Lot of people think that I'm involved in Ukraine because I have Ukrainian grandparents, but I'm involved in Ukraine because I'm American, and I think that the cause of democracy is probably clearer here than anywhere else in the world right now, at least to me." https://t.co/bQUwuZ6uu9
- Aug 27, 202627x their median
An increased number of U.S. troops are now quitting the military, citing being ordered by the Trump regime to murder civilians and break other international laws. https://t.co/rFsaWVdnlQ
- Aug 27, 202621x their median
https://t.co/JzDLP5NNvu
- Aug 18, 202618x their median
A federal judge just ruled that Ghislaine Maxwell’s Epstein grand jury records must be made public, rejecting every objection she raised. Congress’s Epstein Files Transparency Act overrides grand jury secrecy rules. #OpDeathEaters ---------------------------------------------------------- Federal grand jury material from the prosecution of Ghislaine Maxwell must be released to the public, a New York judge ruled on 11 August, rejecting every objection Maxwell raised to keeping it sealed. U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska found that the Epstein Files Transparency Act overrides the secrecy orders that have covered the material since Maxwell's 2021 conviction, and that the statute establishes the compelling need federal courts require before grand jury material is opened. Maxwell's filings against disclosure amounted to "a veritable kitchen sink of objections," Preska wrote, running through procedural, statutory and constitutional grounds, all of which she found meritless. Release will carry the victim-protecting redactions the Act authorises. What comes out Grand jury subpoenas and material gathered by the government during the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein fall within the order, together with depositions taken from Maxwell in April and July 2016 in the civil defamation case Virginia Giuffre brought against her. Prosecutors built two perjury counts in Maxwell's federal indictment on those 2016 depositions, charging her with lying under oath when she denied knowing about Epstein's recruitment and abuse of girls. The counts were later dismissed. Records held by the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner, which represented Giuffre, are covered by the ruling. Giuffre died in April 2025. Her allegations against Prince Andrew, which he has denied, cost him his royal titles and, on 18 February 2026, brought his arrest on suspicion of misconduct in public office over the alleged sharing of confidential documents with Epstein. The statute against Rule 6(e) Grand jury secrecy in the federal system runs on Rule 6(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, which permits disclosure only in narrow circumstances and has historically defeated attempts to open Epstein-related material. Two federal judges refused Justice Department applications to unseal Epstein and Maxwell grand jury records in 2025 on exactly that ground. Public Law 119-38 changed the calculation. Signed on 19 November 2025, it directs the Attorney General to publish all unclassified Justice Department records on Epstein and Maxwell, permits withholding only for victim identity, child sexual abuse material, active investigations, images of death or injury and classified national security material, and expressly bars withholding for embarrassment, reputational harm or political sensitivity. Preska's reading treats the Act as a congressional finding of public need that displaces the earlier secrecy orders rather than as a request the court may weigh against them. Maxwell's position Maxwell is serving 20 years, imposed in June 2022 after a jury convicted her in December 2021 on rape trafficking and conspiracy counts for recruiting and grooming girls for Epstein. She was moved from a federal prison in Florida to a minimum security federal prison camp in Texas in the summer of 2025, after two days of interviews with Todd Blanche, then Deputy Attorney General and now Attorney General. A Bureau of Prisons whistleblower has since given House Judiciary Democrats evidence of preferential treatment at the camp. Maxwell filed an application for commutation with the Trump administration in November 2025. Her Supreme Court appeal was rejected in 2025. Appearing under subpoena at a House Oversight Committee deposition on 9 February 2026, Maxwell invoked the Fifth Amendment and declined to answer. Her lawyer David Oscar Markus said afterwards: "Maxwell is prepared to speak fully and honestly if granted clemency by President Trump." Her legal team has said she could explain why Trump and Bill Clinton are innocent of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein. The Senate vote The Senate adopted a resolution opposing any pardon or commutation for Maxwell on 29 July 2026, by unanimous consent, with no senator objecting. Senator Jacky Rosen brought it. "Sexual predators should not be afforded preferential treatment," Senator Jack Reed said of the administration's handling of Maxwell. Unanimous consent means no Republican senator objected, six days before the Judiciary Committee advanced Blanche's nomination on 4 August and 10 days before he won a floor vote 50 to 49. Senate resolutions of this kind carry no legal force. Presidential clemency is not reviewable by the courts, and Trump could commute Maxwell's sentence at any point, including after the grand jury material becomes public.
- Aug 25, 202615x their median
Worldwide solidarity with Ukraine https://t.co/eJoaWod2Ob
- Aug 24, 202614x their median
The biggest threat to the national security of Canada, Mexico, Denmark/Greenland, and South America is the United States: a hostile, parasitic, resource-hungry state run by an international cabal of pedo-kleptocrats.
- Feb 17, 202611x their median
Comment from my US lawyer, "If the full unredacted Epstein files were ever released it would likely bring down the entire US Government and many American major institutions."
- Aug 23, 20269.6x their median
What led to the break down between Canada and the US? The answer is simple, Trump and his government are lying cheating asshole traitor pieces of fascist Russia-Israeli sponsored shit hellbent on destroying global democracy and our western way of life.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 858 interactions against 5.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 223 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 113K times each, and 0.762% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 14 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 223 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 83K interactions, about 97x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #opdeatheaters, #bindingchaos.
- What is Anonymous's engagement rate on X?
- Anonymous (@YourAnonCentral) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 223 original posts from the last 30 days against 5,226,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.016%, Anonymous sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @YourAnonCentral have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @YourAnonCentral post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 14 posts per day across the measured window.