Back to @Xx17965797N's profile

Truthseeker engagement report

@Xx17965797N - 463K followers on X

Measured over 148 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 463K followers
Per impression
0.888%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
123
interactions (median)
Saved
0.238%
33 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
6.07/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 148 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.888% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 148 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 803x its own typical post.

Measured over 148 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Truthseeker's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Truthseeker sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 108 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026803x their median

    This has to be the best moment of this baby’s life 😂❤️ https://t.co/4MT7CJgg7N

    94K4.5K4001593.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026264x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: An Ohio State University professor tackled a TV cameraman to the ground simply for asking questions about Epstein. "I think we can all guess his political affiliation based on his reaction to an uncomfortable question..." https://t.co/beYDA8BDM6

    24K6.8K1.5K4427.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026179x their median

    😄Love It👇 https://t.co/SWUzf98sgd

    17K4.1K255206261K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2023212x their median

    South Africa’s black party sings “kill the Boer (Whites), kill the White farmer”. https://t.co/JdPg9Okgnj

    8.5K3.0K2.3K2.2K8.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 12, 2025111x their median

    Former Abercrombie & Fitch CEO Mike Jeffries, who was arrested for running an alleged international s*x-trafficking ring, has been declared mentally unfit to stand trial. Jeffries is reportedly suffering from advanced dementia, including Alzheimer’s, and now requires round-the-clock care due to severe cognitive decline. He allegedly organized drug-fueled s*x parties where young male models were coerced into acts for money—similar to the allegations against Diddy. Jeffrey Epstein’s financier, Les Wexner, appointed Jeffries as CEO of Abercrombie & Fitch in 1992.

    7.3K3.5K8823031.0M viewsView on X
  • Jan 8, 202631x their median

    ‼️The End Of Mankind Nasa "Leaked Document" 2013 Debra Tebarez👇 https://t.co/bsTLMy2Ign

    2.5K1.1K8797152K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202626x their median

    Hidden footage showing what really hit the Pentagon. Watch closely and decide for yourself. https://t.co/L2kGG3rKE8

    2.1K82713744166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202624x their median

    Can somebody check on this lady what the fuck is going on in Michigan https://t.co/PnrVdeklIe

    2.3K30528348500K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202624x their median

    They always show you the plans. https://t.co/TP4mbYkk3u

    2.3K5636431123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202623x their median

    ⚠️Older video 2020,In-Depth Exploration by MB, https://t.co/pvK3BGCeaP

    2.4K344217396K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 123 interactions against 463K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 148 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.888% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 6.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 148 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 803x its own typical post.

What is Truthseeker's engagement rate on X?
Truthseeker (@Xx17965797N) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 148 original posts from the last 30 days against 463,037 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Truthseeker sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Xx17965797N have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Xx17965797N post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 6.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going