Back to @Xuxiaodong3's profile

徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人 engagement report

@Xuxiaodong3 - 470K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.028%
of 470K followers
Per impression
0.525%
25K views on a typical post
Reach
5.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
131
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 131 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.525% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.028%, 徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 4, 20268.5x their median

    正式向上海教育局,复旦大学纪委投诉沈逸教授 公然侮辱同胞为“汉奸” 。教育局正式受理, 我们知道很可能没什么后续,或者惩罚不痛不痒,但我们必须要坚持!因为这是我们的态度!在这里混沌的环境中,我们要坚持我们的态度 司马南 沈逸 才是真正的害群之马 我的环境 我只能说到这里~感谢上海徐哥 https://t.co/nZYWFuLSvK

    875441885112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.1x their median

    今天8月23日北京时间中午12点,中国第一战地记者唐师曾 唐老师走了…… 2019年10月,我的必图拳馆走进来一位老大哥,张嘴就说,徐晓冬我要当你最大年纪的徒弟可以吗…………,之后7年,我反而从唐老师那里学到了很多知识。 今年4月我去医院看望唐老师,又说了很多很多,唐老师走好🙏 https://t.co/JKvoO0S5xY

    817292135107K viewsView on X
  • Jun 26, 20263.2x their median

    飞机✈️是真的……小型飞机,据说对大厦主体没有明显影响……………………我只知道这些,实事求是,不造谣…… https://t.co/OKJYIPzCah

    233161652271K viewsView on X
  • Apr 25, 20262.9x their median

    https://t.co/3Zu2aRIoIb

    231111351104K viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20262.8x their median

    2017年 4 月27日 传武严父 https://t.co/OHXMDhqR6L

    291275269K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20262.8x their median

    我徐晓冬2017年打假太极☯️拳……到现在2026年 被它们网络封杀,我还活着,不让我出国!网络上屏蔽我的名字,我的脸!我就眼睁睁看着,一帮蠢猪 继续在祸害中国武术!祸国殃民! 我就眼睁着睁看着蠢猪们装逼! 我等着 拨云见日 那一天! https://t.co/mO1f8OqsgI

    2611191171K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20262.7x their median

    这就是足球⚽️!这就是阿根廷🇦🇷!你怎能不爱!!!那些梅西黑粉们闭嘴吧!哈哈哈向英格兰🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿致敬🫡 西班牙🇪🇸决赛见! 热爱我的热爱🔥阿根廷🇦🇷。 https://t.co/DU49QpILD5

    270881154K viewsView on X
  • Jun 14, 20262.4x their median

    日本🇯🇵亚洲之光!!!!我这大夜,熬夜值了!睡觉2小时,一会看UFC白宫站 https://t.co/xR1Vt5VOsl

    234376134K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 20262.3x their median

    长江大侠吕紫剑几乎所有比武,都是假的!一直骗到死! 很多坏人,是一只坏,坏到死!死坏死坏的 https://t.co/N9IFYRm85T

    243948338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.9x their median

    7年前与唐老师第一次吃饭🍚。历历在目 https://t.co/oHnH39bFBQ

    193550026K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 131 interactions against 470K followers, an engagement rate of 0.028%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 25K times each, and 0.525% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 8.5x its own typical post.

What is 徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人's engagement rate on X?
徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人 (@Xuxiaodong3) has an engagement rate of 0.028%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 469,839 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.028%, 徐晓冬 北京格斗狂人 sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Xuxiaodong3 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Xuxiaodong3 post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going