Back to @Xapime's profile

Xavier Pimentel engagement report

@Xapime - 293K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.126%
of 293K followers
Per impression
1.39%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
9.01%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
368
interactions (median)
Saved
0.083%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.77/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 368 interactions against 293K followers, an engagement rate of 0.126%. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #denunciaciudadana.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.126%, Xavier Pimentel sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 347 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 9, 202660x their median

    Pensó que lo iban a atropellar, luego pensó que un malandrín le iba pegar y después pensó que la policía lo iba a confundir, demasiada adrenalina en pocos segundos. https://t.co/0rrNIe8E48

    41K2.6K133981.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 202685x their median

    Statement on behalf of Concacaf and its 41 Member Associations https://t.co/4ea96cuFCu 🔗

    25K4.0K6001.4K8.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202618x their median

    La implosión de Derecha Diario ha dejado al descubierto algo mucho mayor: el Plan MAGA para Latinoamérica. Para entenderlo hay que abandonar la idea lineal de causas y efectos. No estamos ante una conspiración clásica, con una cabeza que da órdenes y una organización que las ejecuta. Estamos ante una red. La red no tiene un centro. No tiene un jefe. Ni siquiera tiene una ideología precisa. La red tiene un objetivo compartido: capturar, uno por uno, los gobiernos de Latinoamérica para lo que llama la “ultraderecha”, una ideología bastante confusa que reúne nacionalismo, autoritarismo, fundamentalismo religioso, defensa extrema de las grandes fortunas y lo que se le ocurra en la marcha a cualquiera de sus operadores. Los integrantes de la red se encuentran en reuniones, se reconocen, se financian entre sí, intercambian tácticas y se prestan infraestructura. Y comparten, sobre todo, un método. Steve Bannon resumió este método con brutal precisión: “Flood the zone with shit.” Inunda el territorio de mierda. Es decir: saturar el espacio público con tal cantidad de mentiras, difamaciones, escándalos, bots y versiones contradictorias que finalmente resulte imposible distinguir lo verdadero de lo falso. El caos informativo no es un efecto secundario. Es el método. Para conseguirlo, la red utiliza enormes cantidades de dinero --extraído de los gobiernos capturados y de negocios ilegales--, medios de propaganda y granjas de bots capaces de fabricar tendencias, multiplicar falsedades, destruir reputaciones y falsificar incluso la apariencia de una opinión pública. Parte del dinero procede de empresarios y organizaciones ideológicas. Otra parte, según distintas investigaciones y denuncias, de estructuras estatales y circuitos opacos o ilegales (lavado de dinero, narcotráfico, venta de influencias). Y existen además vínculos que deben investigarse con las agencias secretas estadounidenses. No hace falta que alguien coordine cada movimiento. Ésa es precisamente la novedad. No hay un cerebro: hay una red. No hay una doctrina coherente: hay un objetivo. No se busca convencer: se busca capturar. No se explaya una ideología: se intoxica. Una vez capturado un gobierno, ese gobierno aporta poder, legitimidad y recursos para ayudar a capturar al siguiente. Así ha avanzado la red por el continente. Ecuador, Chile, Colombia, Bolivia... Y hoy quedan frente a ella únicamente dos obstáculos: Brasil y México. México y Brasil deben coordinarse contra esta conspiración que representa ni más ni menos la psicopatía como método y como único fin. Para terminar, un detalle interesante: la primera víctima de esta red en cada país ha sido el ala liberal de la política. Capturados por la incierta promesa de compartir el botín, atraídos por "la libertad" de los psicópatas, los intelectuales y medios liberales se han rendido en cada país a la red, que al engullir al Estado, no les ha compartido sino migajas.

    4.2K2.3K1049674K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20265.5x their median

    Oscar-winning songwriter Glen Hansard killed in crash https://t.co/jErJkKn9Id

    1.5K256851611.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20265.5x their median

    ¡GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO! ¡ECUATORIANOOOOOOOOOOOO! ¡KENY ARROYO, CHECHÉ, CÓMO LE PEGASTE A ESA PELOTA! ¡MAGIA, DEJEN UNA MONEDA EN SUS ASIENTOS, SERVIDOS SEÑORES! https://t.co/1WdLCAqZ4f

    1.8K153181794K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.7x their median

    Este video es oro puro 😂😂😂 La cara de algunos https://t.co/Jd3jBGjZyC

    1.2K3688341115K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20263.2x their median

    Armas antiguas y de colección incautadas en Quito son las mismas que la justicia ya devolvió en 2025 https://t.co/kFaeC4qNiK 30 militares ingresaron a una casa en Quito sin orden judicial amparados en el estado de excepción. Reportaron el hecho casi cuatro horas después, pues primero atendieron a TC. Las Fuerzas Armadas sacaron las armas de la bodega y las expusieron en el parqueadero. Criminalística se negó a acudir al lugar porque la escena ya había sido manipulada. El lote confiscado, que incluye armas largas y cortas de las guerras mundiales, coincide con el armamento investigado en 2024 y devuelto por orden de un juez en 2025.

    583481426756K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.0x their median

    Nos están fregando. La candidata a la alcaldía de Guayaquil, Cynthia Viteri, señaló que la administración de la alcaldesa Tatiana Coronel está contratando “gente peligrosísima”, para dejar jodido al Municipio: “como en la película de Harry Potter y Los Innombrables”. #TodoPorUnVoto

    51412836493230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.4x their median

    Desconfío! 👀😶‍🌫️ https://t.co/RWUU7dgHPf

    45813624333144K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 20251.9x their median

    “Señor, hazme un instrumento de tu paz. Donde hay odio, que lleve yo el amor. Donde haya ofensa, que lleve yo el perdón. Donde haya discordia, que lleve yo la unión.” - San Francisco de Asis.

    598830530K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#denunciaciudadana

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 368 interactions against 293K followers, an engagement rate of 0.126%. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 1.39% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 60x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Xavier Pimentel's engagement rate on X?
Xavier Pimentel (@Xapime) has an engagement rate of 0.126%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 292,706 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.126%, Xavier Pimentel sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Xapime have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Xapime post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going