Back to @XPENG_Global's profile

XPENG engagement report

@XPENG_Global - 432K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 432K followers
Per impression
0.042%
444K views on a typical post
Reach
102.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
185
interactions (median)
Saved
0.002%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 432K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 444K times each, and 0.042% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 102.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #physicalai.

Compared with accounts its own size

XPENG's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, XPENG sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 286 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 20266.4x their median

    We made it! XPENG launches the world’s first automated production line for advanced general‑purpose humanoid robots. The world’s first advanced general‑purpose humanoid robot has completed automated production and autonomously walks off the line. $XPEV https://t.co/ayEiFFgO5p

    94513942552.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.9x their median

    Explorer of Physical AI Mobility. Now lighting up one of Germany's busiest hubs. The XPENG L03 is making its mark, one destination at a time. $XPEV https://t.co/htePOeuBkU

    5653111823.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.8x their median

    Real-world interaction test: Four capabilities show just how human-like IRON is. Autonomous orientation, dynamic identity memory, seamless multilingual switching, multi-intelligence Q&A. XPENG IRON recognizes you, understands you, and responds to you. $XPEV https://t.co/fIN2yYmfNv

    397693125542K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.7x their median

    Rainy Night Challenge for XPENG L03. XPENG NGP navigates busy city streets with confidence. A one-take real-world test. No cuts. No edits. Smart driving at its best. $XPEV https://t.co/Mcmeme7GYn

    408532851.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.3x their median

    "Physical AI for All" at GIIAS 2026! 🇮🇩 Moments from our press conference in Jakarta. One year of progress, redefining smart mobility. The future of technology takes its next step. $XPEV https://t.co/TSVUVNV58i

    35841193923K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.1x their median

    A football legend meets the future of AI mobility. ⚽️ During Ronaldinho’s visit to Slovakia, the XPENG P7+ and flagship XPENG G9 delivered every journey with smart technology, premium comfort and effortless style. $XPEV https://t.co/dqkSLmT02y

    3572083473K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20262.0x their median

    Movement brings people together. So does the XPENG L03. Pamela Reif and He Xiaopeng share a day full of energy, laughter, and great moments. Good energy is always contagious. $XPEV https://t.co/5jRcLw83nx

    2542010302.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.0x their median

    X-wing doors rise to create an instant sense of occasion and unmistakable presence. Paired with a full-width light bar and low-slung stance, they give the flagship an imposing presence at first glance. $XPEV https://t.co/daw4Jv2dFz

    33621111542K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20261.9x their median

    Australian media explores Guangzhou with XPENG NGP. Navigating the city’s complex streets with confidence and ease. AI driving that handles dense urban traffic with precision. The future of smart mobility leaves a lasting impression. $XPEV https://t.co/fkxV5UXA0I

    306381211.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.9x their median

    The future is here, Morocco! 🇲🇦 Highlights from the official launch of the XPENG P7+. Taking intelligent driving to the next level. Watch the video and step into tomorrow. $XPEV https://t.co/WoaMcI80HX

    29829234932K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#physicalai

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 185 interactions against 432K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 444K times each, and 0.042% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 102.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

What is XPENG's engagement rate on X?
XPENG (@XPENG_Global) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 432,195 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, XPENG sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @XPENG_Global have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @XPENG_Global post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going