Back to @X22Report's profile

X22 Report engagement report

@X22Report - 493K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.213%
of 493K followers
Per impression
6.21%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.077%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 6.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

X22 Report's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.213%, X22 Report sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 318 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202613x their median

    It was never Iran. Iran is the proxy. Canada is a proxy. Ukraine is a proxy. Venezuela was a proxy. Ask who's actually being fought.

    11K1.6K869103728K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 202611x their median

    California charges $1.47 a gallon in gas taxes and fees. Texas charges 38 cents. Still think voting Democrat lowers your gas price?

    8.9K2.5K703250K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20269.3x their median

    Trump didn’t enter office to sign a few executive orders. He went into this to reverse everything they have done since 1913. End the fiat system. Return economic power to the people. Dismantle the central-bank cabal.

    7.6K1.8K3675877K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.6x their median

    GE Appliances is shifting dryer production from Mexico to Kentucky as part of a major domestic investment. The cabal sent American production overseas. Trump is bringing it home.

    5.9K1.0K421335K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.1x their median

    Trump proposing a $5,000 dividend for American citizens is called “bribery” but providing taxpayer-funded healthcare, housing, and education to people here illegally is called “compassion.” Funny how the outrage only begins when Americans are the ones benefiting.

    4.8K1.5K1192843K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.9x their median

    The battle isn’t really Trump vs. Canada. Canada is being used as a proxy in a much larger economic war. The battle is really between the central bank and what Trump is trying to do right now. The cabal’s financial system is trapped.

    4.8K1.2K1243946K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.6x their median

    Americans in mental institutions: 1970 — 337,000 2020 — 36,000 Where did these people go?

    3.8K9011.1K12079K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20265.4x their median

    Imagine keeping your entire paycheck. No federal income tax. Higher-paying domestic jobs. Cheaper energy. You get to keep your full paycheck. The transition will begin with working Americans and gradually dismantle their dependence on the old system.

    4.7K8321983052K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20265.2x their median

    Trump isn't building a new debt system to compete with the old one. He's building an income system, money coming in, nothing to pay back. That's the whole game.

    4.6K852401136K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20265.2x their median

    Trump secured Venezuelan oil. Announced a new Texas refinery project. Ordered an investigation into high gasoline prices. Now he’s meeting directly with refiners. I wonder what’s about to happen with gas prices. The old pricing system may be about to break.

    4.4K9511101942K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 493K followers, an engagement rate of 0.213%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 6.21% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is X22 Report's engagement rate on X?
X22 Report (@X22Report) has an engagement rate of 0.213%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 492,712 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.213%, X22 Report sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @X22Report have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @X22Report post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going