Back to @WuBlockchain's profile

Wu Blockchain engagement report

@WuBlockchain - 558K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 558K followers
Per impression
0.385%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
74
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.5/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 78% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 508 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 13, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wu Blockchain's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Wu Blockchain sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 643 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20266.9x their median

    Hyperliquid Officially Activates "AQAv2" to Buy Back and Burn HYPE with USDC Reserve Yield Hyperliquid announced the activation of its "AQAv2 (Aligned Quote Asset v2)" framework starting August 26, which directs yield generated from USDC reserves toward programmatic market buybacks and burns of the native HYPE token. Under the structure—supported by Circle as technical deployer and Coinbase as treasury manager—approximately 90% of reserve yield is shared with the protocol and transferred in 30-day cycles to the Assistance Fund (AF) to execute HYPE buybacks and permanent burns. Yield accrual begins on August 26 with the inaugural payout and execution scheduled for October 3.

    41446341442K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20265.0x their median

    Michael Saylor :AI will amplify the scarcity of premium assets In a September 28, 2026 Binance @binance interview, Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor @saylor described two inflation rates: CPI at only about 3% as machines make things cheaper, and the cost of capital — scarce assets the wealthy want — up 15% annually for six years, best proxied by the S&P. Robots can clean, drive and cook but cannot create more Palm Beach beachfront, another Picasso or more Bitcoin — scarce assets won't get cheaper; ordinary people should accumulate wealth.

    2873939570K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.4x their median

    Former Mt.Gox CEO Says Ledger Device Purchased From Malaysia Contained a Spy Module With a SIM Chip Despite Intact Packaging Former Mt.Gox CEO Mark Karpelès said a Ledger Nano X hardware wallet he received from Malaysia had intact shrink-wrap packaging but contained a spy module hidden where the screen padding should have been, making it difficult to spot even after opening the casing. He shared comparison photos of the original circuit board and the implant, saying such implants have evolved from hand-soldered wiring into circuit boards that are easier to mistake for original hardware. Karpelès is requesting device photos from affected users to identify similar implants and advised following Ledger's official security guidance. Ledger has not been shown to have officially confirmed the module's functionality or any connection to recent CryptoBilis customer losses.

    2136044641K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20264.2x their median

    Vitalik Buterin: Without AI, Ethereum's Lean Roadmap Might Have to Wait Until 2040 Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin @VitalikButerin said in an October 9 interview with Balaji Srinivasan @balajis at the Network State Conference 2026 that AI has become an important factor in advancing the Lean Ethereum roadmap. Buterin said that given the roadmap's current goals and level of ambition, without AI, the work might have taken until 2040 or even 2050 to complete. He added that AI is now contributing to a significant amount of research and coding, substantially accelerating progress on the roadmap.

    22235401249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    Michael Saylor: The Single Most Important Thing Right Now Is to Fix the Credit Business At Strategy's Q2 2026 investor Q&A, livestreamed on Aug. 17, regarding the company's future business blueprint and capital allocation strategy, Executive Chairman Michael Saylor @saylor stated that Strategy aims to be the JPMorgan of digital assets, though without copying traditional banking models. He emphasized that building on holding 4% of the global Bitcoin supply, the key lies in developing products on top of Bitcoin, such as digital equity MSTR and digital credit STRC. The single most important task right now is fixing the digital credit business, as fixing credit will expand equity premiums and drive the company's valuation toward hundreds of billions or even a trillion dollars.

    2401518259K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.4x their median

    Hyperliquid Strategies Expands Equity Financing Facility to $2.5 Billion, May Use Proceeds to Buy HYPE Hyperliquid Strategies (NASDAQ: PURR) has increased the aggregate capacity of its ChEF equity financing facility from $1.0 billion to $2.5 billion. The company may raise funds as needed by issuing newly issued common shares to Chardan Capital Markets, with proceeds intended for general corporate purposes, including potential purchases of HYPE. After aggregate share sales under the facility reach $1.0 billion, any additional shares issued at less than $12.02 per share are generally subject to a cap of 42,641,847 shares, equal to 19.99% of the company’s shares outstanding immediately before the amendment, unless shareholder approval is obtained or otherwise not required under Nasdaq rules.

    2022813729K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.4x their median

    Hyperliquid's Cumulative Protocol Revenue Exceeds $1.4 Billion, With Over $1.26 Billion Spent on Open-Market HYPE Buybacks According to an onchain perpetuals market research report by Castle Labs, Hyperliquid's cumulative protocol revenue has exceeded $1.4 billion, with more than $1.26 billion spent on open-market HYPE buybacks. It holds over 56% of the onchain perpetuals market by open interest. The report notes that Hyperliquid's Builder Codes mechanism gives third-party wallets and apps access to its trading infrastructure, allowing them to integrate perpetuals trading and earn revenue without building their own systems. Phantom has earned more than $25 million in cumulative revenue through the mechanism, while MetaMask has earned over $10.5 million.

    17731311029K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20263.2x their median

    Ledger Confirms Hardware Implant Attack, Says Its Systems Were Not Breached Ledger said an unauthorized hardware implant was found inside an affected device, confirming physical tampering. The company said there is no evidence its own infrastructure, systems or services were compromised, while distributor CryptoBilis has suspended hardware wallet sales. Ledger advised affected users to avoid initializing unused devices and consider moving assets to wallets created with new recovery phrases. Earlier on-chain analysis estimated losses linked to the incident at more than $86 million.

    14034511233K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    Bitcoin Payments in El Salvador Have Practically Dried Up Jon Atack, a Bitcoin Core contributor residing in El Salvador, reported that a restaurant in El Zonte (known as "Bitcoin Beach") told him his lunch bill was the establishment's only bitcoin transaction for the entire month, with staff noting that everyday BTC payments have significantly declined in favor of card payments. Analysts attribute the drop in merchant velocity to a prevalent "HODL" mindset—where holders view Bitcoin as a long-term store of value rather than transactional cash—alongside high asset volatility. Following revisions under its IMF loan agreement, El Salvador also made merchant acceptance of Bitcoin voluntary rather than mandatory.

    15325361850K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.1x their median

    CoinEx to Shut Down After Nearly Nine Years as Crypto Slump, Compliance Costs Bite CoinEx said it will wind down operations after nearly nine years, citing a prolonged crypto-market downturn, shrinking trading volumes and liquidity, and rising regulatory and compliance costs across major jurisdictions. The exchange will stop new registrations and move futures trading to reduce-only mode on Sept. 15, end futures, staking, lending and other non-spot services on Sept. 22, halt all spot trading on Sept. 29, and close withdrawals and the platform on Dec. 22. CoinEx is a long-running global crypto exchange launched in December 2017.

    1612731832K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 74 interactions against 558K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.385% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video and 78% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 508 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is Wu Blockchain's engagement rate on X?
Wu Blockchain (@WuBlockchain) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 558,310 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Wu Blockchain sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WuBlockchain have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WuBlockchain post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going