Back to @Wretch32's profile

Old Flame engagement report

@Wretch32 - 690K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 690K followers
Per impression
0.689%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
3.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
158
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 158 interactions against 690K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.689% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 275x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #bloccstar.

Compared with accounts its own size

Old Flame's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Old Flame sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video53% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 1, 2026275x their median

    🚨🔴🔵 Mika Godts has given green light to Paris Saint-Germain project! Official negotiations club to club are underway with Ajax request around €60m. Godts, ready to accept personal terms if the two clubs get the deal done. PSG are optimistic. Exclusive story, confirmed. https://t.co/TFS2RG7BlK

    40K2.1K9866368.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 2026194x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Peter Drury has been chosen to commentate on Lionel Messi’s farewell match on October 6th. After his iconic commentary during the 2022 World Cup final, it only feels right that he gets the call for Messi’s final dance. 🥹❤️ https://t.co/QbV3kIDpYS

    28K2.6K135112245K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202641x their median

    Arsenal want to win the trophy, and they start Noni Madueke and Christos Tzolis from the Belgian Pro League. Manchester City is going to enjoy this, an easy win for Enzo Maresca’s boys.

    4.1K4071.4K571737K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202619x their median

    Usher: put your hands together for the one and ONLY - BRANDY 😭🔥🔥 yooooo https://t.co/4jjA1m5TKO

    2.5K4114079109K viewsView on X
  • Jul 26, 202612x their median

    this is beautiful. https://t.co/0XPbPuhr5Q

    1.8K111827676K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20267.5x their median

    Out Midnight💨 https://t.co/1Le8E4kQhS

    877234255176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.7x their median

    RIP Sway a real north London rap pioneer thank you for everything brother you’ll be missed by so many 🥺🕊️ https://t.co/ZRqjTBKjYY

    866153171540K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.8x their median

    Which player are you going to punch Madueke??😭😭😭🤣 https://t.co/EAu9BmXSbB

    6914022955K viewsView on X
  • Dec 4, 202526x their median

    10 years ago we dropped YOUNG FIRE OLD FLAME 10 years to the exact date 12.12.25 were dropping the DELUXE🔥 8 new records 💿 https://t.co/sBdiG9D6c7

    327270141648K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.0x their median

    This Q4 run is sponsored by God

    3361232824K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bloccstar

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 158 interactions against 690K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 0.689% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 275x its own typical post.

What is Old Flame's engagement rate on X?
Old Flame (@Wretch32) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 689,857 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Old Flame sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Wretch32 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Wretch32 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going