روائع الأدب العالمي engagement report
@WorldWAdab - 181K followers on X
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
روائع الأدب العالمي's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 69% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.101%, روائع الأدب العالمي sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 95% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 2% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 308 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 14, 2026168x their median
Marc Haynes recordó una vez: «Cuando tenía siete años, en 1983, vi a Roger Moore sentado en el aeropuerto de Niza. Entusiasmado, le pedí a mi abuelo que fuéramos a pedirle un autógrafo. Mi abuelo, sin conocer a James Bond, le dijo simplemente: “Mi nieto dice que usted es famoso. ¿Puede firmar esto?”. Roger, con una amabilidad excepcional, me preguntó mi nombre y firmó con buenos deseos. Sin embargo, al volver a nuestros asientos, advertí que no decía “James Bond”. Regresamos y mi abuelo le comentó que había firmado con el nombre equivocado. Roger Moore me llamó, me miró y, en voz baja, me susurró: “Debo firmar como Roger Moore, porque si no, Blofeld podría encontrarme aquí”. Muchos años después, mientras trabajábamos juntos en una filmación para UNICEF, le conté la historia y, con su habitual encanto, me dijo: “No lo recuerdo, pero me alegra que hayas conocido a James Bond”. Luego, justo antes de marcharse, se acercó de nuevo, levantó una ceja y me dijo: “Claro que recuerdo nuestro encuentro en Niza… pero no podía decirlo, esos camarógrafos podrían estar trabajando para Blofeld”».
- Oct 14, 2026151x their median
https://t.co/r2yLbT8kEG
- Oct 16, 202681x their median
Un profesor le dió un globo🎈a cada alumno que tuvo que inflarlo, escribir su nombre en él y tirarlo al pasillo. El profesor entonces mezcló todos los globos y dio a los estudiantes 5 minutos para que cada uno encontrara su propio globo. Tras la acelerada búsqueda, nadie encontró su globo. En ese momento, el profesor les dijo a los estudiantes que tomaran el primer globo que encontraran y se lo entregaran a la persona cuyo nombre estaba escrito en él. En 5 minutos cada uno tenía su propio globo. El profesor dijo a los estudiantes: - Estos globos son como la felicidad. Nunca la encontraremos si todo el mundo está buscando la suya, pero si nos preocupamos por la felicidad de los demás también encontraremos la nuestra.
- Oct 12, 202667x their median
الذئب لا ينسى أبدًا ." https://t.co/Ic8ypeboLg
- Feb 4, 202459x their median
الديمقراطية لا تصلُح لمُجتمع جاهل ؛ لأن أغلبية من الحمير ستُحدد مصيرك ." - جورج برنارد شو https://t.co/06fl6QVcN8
- Sep 13, 202658x their median
من يعرف الحقيقة يعاني أكثر من غيره ." https://t.co/DEZKCfx3N0
- Oct 12, 202618x their median
«La capacidad de ocupar inteligentemente el tiempo libre es el grado más alto de la cultura personal». Bertrand Russell ✍️ https://t.co/8IA7jpK5Oc
- Oct 15, 202612x their median
Accusée de plagiat… parce que son texte était « trop bon » pour une sans-abri À 15 ans, Liz Murray vivait dans les rues de New York City. Sa mère venait de mourir du sida, son père était sans-abri, et elle dormait dans le métro ou sur des bancs publics. Quand elle décida de retourner à l’école, elle s’inscrivit à la Humanities Preparatory Academy, à Manhattan. Elle étudiait le jour, passait ses nuits à la bibliothèque ou dans des diners ouverts 24h/24, faisant durer un café pendant des heures. Un jour, son professeur lui rendit une dissertation avec cette note : « Viens me voir après le cours. C’est du plagiat. » Ce ne l’était pas. Son texte — sur la drogue, la faim, la mort de sa mère, la survie — était simplement jugé « trop mûr » pour une adolescente sans domicile fixe. Elle se défendit. Le professeur finit par la croire. Mais l’accusation révélait un préjugé plus profond : quand quelqu’un issu de la pauvreté réussit, on suppose parfois qu’il a triché. Liz continua malgré tout. Elle termina le lycée en deux ans, puis obtint une bourse du The New York Times qui lui permit d’intégrer Harvard University. Elle y obtint son diplôme en psychologie en 2009 et publia plus tard ses mémoires, Breaking Night. Aujourd’hui, elle est conférencière et entrepreneure dans le domaine de l’éducation. Sa plus grande réussite ? Avoir prouvé que le potentiel ne dépend pas d’une adresse.https://t.co/tnqqbIfGHn
- Sep 14, 202610x their median
المرأة التي تقراً، و تحب الشعر والنصوص الأدبية ، لا يمكن أن تحب بشكل إعتيادي ." https://t.co/umJIjwjYty
- Sep 16, 20269.7x their median
إن الناس الأكثر وعياً وإدراكًا لا يمكن أن يكونوا أشراراً، لأن الشر يتطلب غباء ومحدودية في التفكير ." - جان بول سارتر https://t.co/ek1ORTpRhc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 181 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.4K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 30K interactions, about 168x its own typical post.
- What is روائع الأدب العالمي's engagement rate on X?
- روائع الأدب العالمي (@WorldWAdab) has an engagement rate of 0.101%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,695 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.101%, روائع الأدب العالمي sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WorldWAdab have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WorldWAdab post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.