Back to @WithZack's profile

WithZack engagement report

@WithZack - 440K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 440K followers
Per impression
0.721%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
8.93%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
284
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.3/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.721% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 273x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WithZack's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, WithZack sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,758 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 2026273x their median

    https://t.co/Z1iMGcp44T

    76K1.4K43301.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 2026168x their median

    Aquiles da minha geração / Aquiles da geração de vocês. https://t.co/3WIdVFSybb

    42K2.8K1.6K1.5K15M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 2026111x their median

    Que vergüenza lo de Paredes No debería haber llegado al final y aún por encima hace esta mierda https://t.co/uKppub7xEp

    27K3.7K579272938K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202669x their median

    plex activo en tiktok con luisito comunica! 🌟 https://t.co/cL3dbrNkjP

    19K317374714K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202664x their median

    Hoy a las 17:00, hora argentina, hay convocada una marcha en el Obelisco de Buenos Aires. ¿El motivo? Exigir a la FIFA que repita la final del Mundial. Sí. Repetir la final. 🧵 https://t.co/llQDlHugpD

    5.2K1.1K10K1.4K1.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202636x their median

    Bienvenida Valentina❤️❤️ https://t.co/7J9SoNmoLx

    9.9K14514011311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202634x their median

    ¿Tenéis las espadas afiladas y bien aceitadas? ¿Las pociones preparadas? ¿A Sardinilla ensillada? ¡Es hora de volver a enfrentaros a Eredin y su séquito! The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt — Remastered incorpora multitud de mejoras en los gráficos, la jugabilidad y mucho más. Llegará el 29 de septiembre y estará disponible como actualización gratuita para todos los propietarios del juego en GOG, Steam, Epic Games Store, PlayStation 5 y Xbox Series X|S. También está disponible para reserva en https://t.co/E7W7Pj67Sv y Nintendo Switch 2. ¡Pero eso no es todo! Todos los jugadores que ya tengan el juego base recibirán acceso gratuito a las dos expansiones originales: Hearts of Stone y Blood and Wine. ¡Ambas expansiones también estarán incluidas en el juego base de #TheWitcher3Remastered! Más información aquí: https://t.co/N2t6KjlpZi

    7.8K1.1K369313714K viewsView on X
  • Nov 27, 201928x their median

    Por fin llego el día, despues de casi 3 años, por fin codigo de creador en Clash Royal😍😍 Ya sabéis, el mejor codigo para no verificados ya disponible en la nueva actualización!! https://t.co/IVZ2MmgAm0

    6.7K35684931View on X
  • Jul 10, 202624x their median

    This is HORRIBLE! The flag doesn't blow in the wind in the Black Flag Remake until you get closer to it. We're in 2026 and they STILL can't get it right. YIKES! https://t.co/vXHNyuATwt

    4.9K1381.2K7448.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202623x their median

    La verdad que es un gusto cuando la audiencia antigua se despide así https://t.co/KiCBtHr3vx

    6.5K4923193K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 284 interactions against 440K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.721% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 273x its own typical post.

What is WithZack's engagement rate on X?
WithZack (@WithZack) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 440,294 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, WithZack sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,758 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WithZack have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WithZack post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going