Wise Crypto engagement report
@WiseCrypto_ - 374K followers on X
Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.257% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions. Recurring topics include #coinex, #crypto, #cryptoexchange.
Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #coinex, #crypto, #cryptoexchange.
Compared with accounts its own size
Wise Crypto's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.023%, Wise Crypto sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.696% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 7% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 513 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 12, 2026
🚨 Glassnode: #Bitcoin sellers may be running out of steam around $64K. $BTC has traded between $63.5K–$65K, while 54.6% of supply remains in profit. But Glassnode says a bottom is NOT confirmed yet. The key level? $65K. A clean breakout could validate the recovery thesis. A rejection may mean another leg lower.
- Jul 25, 2026
Whale conviction on $HYPE just hit another level. A single whale (spread across 19 wallets) staked 2.93M $HYPE worth $172M on Hyperliquid over the last 24 hours. What's even crazier? Those tokens were accumulated 9 months ago at an average entry of $44 and are now sitting on roughly $44.5M in unrealised profit — and instead of selling, they're staking. At the same time, another whale received 557,902 $HYPE ($32.87M) via FalconX and moved the entire position to Hyperliquid for staking. That's over $204M in fresh staking from whale wallets. Smart money isn't taking profits... it's doubling down.
- Sep 10, 2026
🚨 ALTCOIN LEVERAGE WARNING For the first time since Dec. 2024, altcoin perpetual futures open interest has overtaken Bitcoin’s. That’s a major red flag. $BTC’s rally is being driven by spot demand + call skew, while leverage is piling into $ZEC and other high-risk altcoins. $ZEC alone hit ~$2.4B in derivatives OI. Michael Bucella says the setup is starting to resemble Oct. 2025 — right before the market-wide liquidation. $BTC may look healthy. Altcoins? ⚠️ September could get very volatile.
- Sep 12, 2026
🚨 https://t.co/rS9S3hCpJ9 just sold another 77,705 $SOL worth ~$7.88M. That brings total sales to: 💰 5.19M $SOL sold 💵 ~$842M in total 📊 Average sell price: $162.30 Big question: How much more $SOL does https://t.co/rS9S3hCpJ9 plan to sell? 👀 https://t.co/ivFt4EcgWY
- Aug 17, 2026
🚨 Critical week ahead for $BTC & $XRP 4 major catalysts could shake crypto markets: 🇺🇸 Trump’s crypto meeting + regulatory talks 🏦 Fed minutes may reset rate-cut/hike expectations 📊 CFTC’s first crypto advisory panel 🇯🇵 Japan GDP & inflation data could impact the yen carry trade $BTC is near $63K, while $XRP is below $1.
- Sep 9, 2026
🚨 Bitcoin volatility is at historic lows. Glassnode’s analysis points to one key driver: long-term holder supply. LTH supply explains ~19% of BTC’s volatility variance, ahead of illiquid supply (~12%) and liveliness (~11%). With ~83% of circulating bitcoin:native held by long-term holders, liquid supply is getting tighter. Low volatility = calm… until demand suddenly shifts. 👀
- Sep 9, 2026
⚛️ Ethereum is racing the quantum clock. The Ethereum Foundation is targeting December 2029 for a quantum-resistant base layer—across execution, consensus, and data. Why the rush? It’s planning for “Q-day” as early as 2030, while ~65% of ETH reportedly sits in quantum-vulnerable addresses. Hegotá is the first major test. 5 hard forks. ~7.2 months each. Can Ethereum upgrade fast enough before quantum computing catches up? 🔐
- Aug 7, 2026
🚨 $BONK tumbles after Upbit delisting notice 🇰🇷 Upbit will remove BONK/KRW & BONK/USDT pairs on Sept 7, citing security concerns and disclosure issues. Price hit $0.00000255 (near 3-year low), now ~$0.00000264 (-7%). Missed the July rally and down 30% this month. https://t.co/UwtL8MrhPa
- Sep 29, 2026
🚨 $BTC enters October ~9% above its Fed-hike-day close. History favors "Uptober" — up 10 of last 15 years, median +11.2% But two signals diverge: 📊 ETF inflows fading fast — 7-day streak brought in $2.98B, but daily buying dropped to just 13% of its Sept 21 peak 📊 Long-term holders are buying the dip (Hodler Net Position Change turned green Aug 31) ⚠️ The big risk: Binance holds $4.35B in long bets clustered near $74,170 on a 30-day view — echoes of Oct 10, 2025, when $19B+ in leveraged positions got wiped out Key levels: reclaim $84,433 first, then $87,360, $90,288, $99,764, $115,094. Below $80,811, risk of a drop to ~$74,957 #Bitcoin #BTC #Uptober
- Sep 12, 2026
🚨 GOLD AT THE EDGE Gold is sitting near $4,347, right on the neckline of a daily head-and-shoulders pattern. 📉 Break below ~$4,335 → $3,950 target (~9% downside) 🔥 Reclaim $4,560 → bearish setup invalidated Meanwhile, hot PPI, rising Treasury yields, a stronger dollar and oil above $105 are adding pressure. But there’s a catch: Gold ETFs pulled $18B in August, while central banks bought 288.9 tonnes in Q2. CPI could decide the next move. Breakdown or fakeout? 👀
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.257% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112 interactions. Recurring topics include #coinex, #crypto, #cryptoexchange.
- What is Wise Crypto's engagement rate on X?
- Wise Crypto (@WiseCrypto_) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 373,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.023%, Wise Crypto sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WiseCrypto_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WiseCrypto_ post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.