Back to @WileyBrainPsych's profile

Wiley Brain and Psychology engagement report

@WileyBrainPsych - 138K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.001%
of 138K followers
Per impression
0.101%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
1.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.101% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #migraine, #headache, #alzheimers. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #migraine, #headache, #alzheimers.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Wiley Brain and Psychology sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 250 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 23, 202617x their median

    Clinical Neuroimaging, official open access journal @asneuroimaging is now indexed in DOAJ @WileyGlobal Editorial Leadership Team @nbavar @teachplaygrub , Board, #peerreviewers for making this milestone possible. Next up @webofscience @PubMedOnline https://t.co/FQQt8stc9C

    239114.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 28, 20259.0x their median

    Exciting news! Wiley Neuro is now Wiley Brain 🧠 Our new home for #neuroscience, #psychology, #CognitiveScience and #BehavioralScience. Follow along for the latest research, insights, and discoveries shaping how we understand the mind!

    162004.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.0x their median

    We welcome your Open Access funded research, free to read, download, and share. Our editorial board includes renowned neurologists and scientists with extensive publications and prestigious awards. Gold Open Access. https://t.co/vjwOmwGXMt https://t.co/g0p6xGjBgY

    22112.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.5x their median

    Why publish with Annals of the Child Neurology Society (ACNS)? We're an official open access publication of the Child Neurology Society, offering an expedited manuscript decision process from submission to acceptance. https://t.co/8IGU0KGIlp https://t.co/naL8y3iPzq

    32001.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.0x their median

    Our editorial board includes renowned experts holding leadership roles and prestigious awards. We also offer a trainee mentoring program to support manuscript preparation. Gold Open Access. https://t.co/Y5V9ruBbTk https://t.co/2Y5y5PRkxW

    31001.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    Why publish with Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (ACTN)? We're a top-ranked journal supported by Annals of Neurology and the Child Neurology Society. Our EiC is accessible and helps with pre-submission inquiries. https://t.co/zXrcOk2FiZ https://t.co/4atWKW3sHl

    22001.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.5x their median

    🧠 From molecular mechanisms and preclinical models to clinical investigation and population-level studies, advancing dementia research requires insights across every stage of discovery. Submit your work: 🔗 https://t.co/rJyV86OAdL #Neuroscience #DementiaResearch #Alzheimers https://t.co/QQczoFxwUE

    30001.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20261.5x their median

    AI is reshaping neurology, fast. Our new three-part series in Annals of Neurology explores AI's principles, practice, ethics, and future across the field, from Dr. Rizzo and colleagues. Read the full virtual issue: https://t.co/jrVWoogSPf https://t.co/ZyQ3HbIyvG

    20012.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20261.5x their median

    📢Submission deadline extended! @EJNeuroscience's forthcoming Special Issue "Understanding Pain: Mechanistic Insights and Therapeutic Pathways" is now accepting submissions until 30 September 2026. Read the call for papers and submit:https://t.co/QwTcKqBqqb https://t.co/ebqkFNN7zt

    21002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    Meet the Innovation Challenge from the Headache journal: a 16-week series tackling unanswered questions from the 2024 AHS/NINDS Headache Research Priorities. Learn more about the challenge → https://t.co/GHnagSfxKx Follow the challenge at @HeadacheJournal https://t.co/eU0O02R6lB

    11001.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#migraine#headache#alzheimers#brainresearch#innovationchallenge

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 138K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.101% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #migraine, #headache, #alzheimers. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Wiley Brain and Psychology's engagement rate on X?
Wiley Brain and Psychology (@WileyBrainPsych) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 138,271 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Wiley Brain and Psychology sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WileyBrainPsych have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @WileyBrainPsych post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going