Back to @WebMD's profile

WebMD engagement report

@WebMD - 2.8M followers on X

Measured over 212 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 2.8M followers
Per impression
1.06%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.19%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
58
interactions (median)
Saved
0.24%
13 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
7.07/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 212 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.193% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 212 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 271 interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 212 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WebMD's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, WebMD sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link99% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 99% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 365 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 20264.7x their median

    Sweet potatoes are a nutritional powerhouse. Find out all the reasons to love these orange beauties. https://t.co/Th45sN5qsb https://t.co/jxk6xtk9tR

    209584010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.1x their median

    It doesn't take much to improve your health with walking. About 150 minutes a week should do it. That's about 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week. If you need to start with way less than that, don't worry. Even 5 minutes a day is better than none. If you want to do more than 30 minutes, great! Just work up to it slowly and talk to your doctor if you have an illness or don't know if you're healthy enough for exercise. https://t.co/wkXWOahQua

    17547769.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20264.0x their median

    Bananas: The Ultimate Nutrient-Packed "Berry"! Did you know that from a botanical standpoint, a banana is actually a berry? Packed with potassium (450mg per medium banana!), they help relax blood vessel walls and flush out excess sodium, protecting you against high blood pressure and strokes. Think you know bananas? How much do you really know about bananas? Take the quiz and see how many you can get right! https://t.co/ZkltMZh0xS

    173493512K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20263.6x their median

    One egg has only 75 calories, plus 7 grams of protein along with other vital nutrients. Remember, your body will burn more calories digesting eggs than a carb-heavy breakfast. And the good news is that eggs are no longer on the "no-list" for people concerned about high cholesterol. It's saturated fat not dietary cholesterol we need to be wary of. Click on the link to read in details about other fat-fighting foods along with surprising facts about how they may work. https://t.co/dRYu0Mvzk0

    163412215K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.5x their median

    Men and women can have different symptoms of a heart attack. Learn the symptoms and how to diagnose a heart attack, treatment options, and what you can do to reduce your risk. https://t.co/HVG9l4C62k https://t.co/ewKDvEk8Bs

    153442214K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.4x their median

    What you eat directly affects your brain chemistry and mood. A Mediterranean diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, and healthy fats has been linked to lower rates of depression. Foods high in omega-3 fatty acids (like salmon and walnuts), folate (leafy greens), and antioxidants support brain health. Meanwhile, processed foods, sugar, and excessive alcohol can trigger inflammation and worsen symptoms. Even small changes in your diet can make a big difference in how you feel both physically and emotionally. https://t.co/nYoZrvmBmA

    149463115K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20263.4x their median

    Scientists have linked onions to many possible health benefits, with most of them coming from the antioxidants in onions. Antioxidants help prevent cell damage in your body. Research shows that one particular antioxidant, called quercetin, protects health in several ways, such as fighting inflammation and boosting the immune system. https://t.co/Lt8zEEsxCB

    140534010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.4x their median

    One egg has only 75 calories, plus 7 grams of protein along with other vital nutrients. Remember, your body will burn more calories digesting eggs than a carb-heavy breakfast. And the good news is that eggs are no longer on the "no-list" for people concerned about high cholesterol. It's saturated fat not dietary cholesterol we need to be wary of. Tell us in the comments below which one is your favorite ? https://t.co/x85dF51hOs

    151420211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.3x their median

    Yes, fruit has protein, and certain fruits can be a sweet way to add protein to your diet! Get more info on the fruits that can help you hit your protein goals: https://t.co/ZAVuF27B1n https://t.co/9BQoLgyRrZ

    147383111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.2x their median

    It doesn't take much to improve your health with walking. About 150 minutes a week should do it. That's about 30 minutes a day, 5 days a week. If you need to start with way less than that, don't worry. Even 5 minutes a day is better than none. If you want to do more than 30 minutes, great! Just work up to it slowly and talk to your doctor if you have an illness or don't know if you're healthy enough for exercise. https://t.co/lTzIN6BhRq

    147342510K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 2.8M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 212 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.193% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 7.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 212 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 99% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 271 interactions, about 4.7x its own typical post.

What is WebMD's engagement rate on X?
WebMD (@WebMD) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 212 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,812,046 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, WebMD sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WebMD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WebMD post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 7.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going