Watcher.Guru engagement report
@WatcherGuru - 4.9M followers on X
Measured over 303 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 5.7K interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.117%. Measured over 303 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 468K times each, and 1.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 303 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
Measured over 303 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Watcher.Guru's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.117%, Watcher.Guru sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 45% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 45% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 133 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 20, 202615x their median
YouTuber Logan Paul purchased this NFT for $635,000 in 2021. Today, it's worth $96. https://t.co/ywvQCq5pB7
- Sep 3, 202610x their median
JUST IN: πΊπΈ Senator Bernie Sanders introduces bill to permanently ban AI that exceeds human intelligence. Violators would face up to 20 years in prison. https://t.co/y2pk79zQlQ
- Oct 5, 20266.0x their median
JUST IN: Former Wall Street banker and whistleblower Simon Andriesz, who exposed Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick's links to Jeffrey Epstein has died by suicide.
- Sep 20, 20226.0x their median
We're on Telegram, follow us for 24/7 news alerts.
- Sep 13, 20265.3x their median
JUST IN: πΊπΈ President Trump rejects calls to slow down AI development.
- Oct 25, 20264.3x their median
JUST IN: π·πΊπΊπΈ Russia says it is ready to supply unlimited diesel to the United States.
- Oct 13, 20264.2x their median
πΊπΈ Senator Elizabeth Warren has repeatedly stated that cryptocurrency is used for money laundering and to avoid sanctions. Today, the US government fined Bank of America $1.2 billion for violating money laundering regulations and sanctions laws. https://t.co/hkf68YwqQQ
- Sep 20, 20263.9x their median
JUST IN: πΈπ¦π¨π³ Saudi Arabia withdraws from Chinese-led digital currency & blockchain payment system that reduces reliance on the US dollar.
- Aug 15, 20263.4x their median
JUST IN: πΊπΈ Number of US homebuyers falls to lowest level ever recorded. https://t.co/FpQgfnBPvu
- Oct 21, 20263.3x their median
JUST IN: πΊπΈ US officially finalizes new crypto stablecoin regulations under the GENIUS Act.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 5.7K interactions against 4.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.117%. Measured over 303 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 468K times each, and 1.23% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.53% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 10.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 303 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 88K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.
- What is Watcher.Guru's engagement rate on X?
- Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) has an engagement rate of 0.117%, based on the median interactions across 303 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,909,200 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.117%, Watcher.Guru sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WatcherGuru have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WatcherGuru post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 10.73 posts per day across the measured window.