Back to @WalletConnect's profile

WalletConnect engagement report

@WalletConnect - 308K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.019%
of 308K followers
Per impression
0.596%
9.9K views on a typical post
Reach
3.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
59
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 0.596% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 137 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WalletConnect's engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, WalletConnect sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 176 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    Scan, pay, done. https://t.co/oXCNCJ5Wei

    1001615613K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.3x their median

    Meet WalletConnect at @CoinfestAsia today! Find out booth at the exhibition hall, try WalletConnect Pay, and get exclusive Bali merch. https://t.co/aRYVeY9Lfz

    1051510311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.0x their median

    That’s a wrap on @CoinfestAsia. 🎬 Thank you to our community for showing up and using WalletConnect Pay. Next, catch us in Singapore this October. https://t.co/xrLcenkoI0

    94118418K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.0x their median

    https://t.co/WGdegDha53

    801317614K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20261.6x their median

    The 2026 Stablecoin Ecosystem Map. A curated view of the companies, protocols, networks and institutions helping build and drive stablecoin adoption around the world. Spanning six regions, the map captures the breadth of an industry growing across markets, use cases and financial infrastructure. Selected for their impact, innovation, adoption and relevance in their markets, these are the organizations helping move the stablecoin industry forward. Throughout the day, we’ll be taking a closer look at the key players shaping each region. The map shows you who is shaping the industry. Stablecon USA is where you meet them. Stablecon USA 📍 Washington, DC 📅 September 9–11

    64914616K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    There are so many ways manual payouts can go wrong. A misspelled wallet address. A payout sent on the wrong chain. There's no way to confirm who's actually receiving the funds. That's not just a UX problem; it's a licensing risk. Here's what wallet native payouts fix ↓ https://t.co/LvAjSb00PS

    6451719.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    SAVE THE DATE Join us for the first-ever WalletConnect Pulse event of its kind. 📍Singapore, October 6 > network w/ finance and tech executives in a curated space > watch live recordings of the WalletConnect podcast With partners @ChangeNOW @turnkeyhq @openfx_ @CantonNetwork https://t.co/4aDCIkR3c7

    6099732K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    How does @coinbase plan to own the end-to-end stablecoin user experience? https://t.co/P7SKbGZjCV

    64137011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Meet us TOMORROW at @CoinfestAsia. >Visit the WalletConnect booth for limited merch (Thursday) >Experience our activation with @TokenPocket_TP (Friday) >Meet Community Lead @lmeowhelena and say hi to @dee_centralized if you want to be in the official WalletConnect after-movie. https://t.co/3NC4IdJFrD

    5017618.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    Do you agree with the UK CEO of @coinbase's prediction for stablecoins in the next 3 years? https://t.co/xlPPna2eCg

    51711111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 34% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 0.596% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 137 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post.

What is WalletConnect's engagement rate on X?
WalletConnect (@WalletConnect) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 307,643 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, WalletConnect sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WalletConnect have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 34% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WalletConnect post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going