Back to @WZStatsGG's profile

Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG engagement report

@WZStatsGG - 304K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.166%
of 304K followers
Per impression
0.942%
54K views on a typical post
Reach
17.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
505
interactions (median)
Saved
0.119%
64 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 505 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.166%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 0.942% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #warzone, #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #warzone, #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

Compared with accounts its own size

Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.166%, Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.127% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202620x their median

    ‼️🚨 BREAKING: MID-AIR EXECUTION IN WARZONE 🚨‼️ 🪂 You’ll be able to execute enemies in the air as you drop from the plane in the new MW4 x #Warzone Beta! Thoughts?! 🤔 https://t.co/urVzkIk0X6

    8.7K4533915375.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202612x their median

    The #MW4 Nuke Animation is sick! 🔥 https://t.co/o2fSd3TZMf

    5.6K2938933373K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.4x their median

    ‼️🚨 GIVEAWAY: BLACKCELL SEASON 6 🚨‼️ We’re giving away a #BO7 x #Warzone Season 6 Blackcell Battle Pass given to us by @CallofDuty 🫡 To enter the giveaway: 1️⃣ Like and Repost 👍 2️⃣ Follow @WZStatsGG 3️⃣ Comment the platform you play on 📆 Winner chosen on Friday! #Ad

    1.3K686721982K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.4x their median

    FIRST #MW4 Tactical Nuke! ☢️ https://t.co/S9mqLqFAmY

    2.1K971112160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.3x their median

    ‼️🚨 FIRST LOOK AT NEW WARZONE BIG MAP 🚨‼️ Here’s a look at some the POI’s of the next #Warzone Battle Royale Map “Hajin” Launches with #MW4 Season 1 https://t.co/6AS8WljynD

    2.0K1123214204K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.1x their median

    ‼️🚨 BREAKING: GRAPPLING HOOKS WILL BE REMOVED FROM WARZONE 🚨‼️ Call of Duty will remove Grappling Hooks standard #Warzone modes! W or L? 🤔 https://t.co/zBISp4EXvY

    1.7K6123326253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.7x their median

    🚨 Grappling Hooks removed from #Warzone! W or L decision? 🤔 https://t.co/lMhWqGTRcF

    1.5K4528257169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    ‼️🚨 NEW WARZONE MAP | BETA TRAILER 🚨‼️ https://t.co/uEMz0YRdmL

    1.3K82124160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.4x their median

    🚨 FIRST IN-GAME LOOK AT NEW RESURGENCE MAP! “Zodiac” will be playable in the #MW4 x #Warzone Beta next weekend starting on August 28! https://t.co/BcwiagkC1C

    1.1K7488110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.1x their median

    ‼️🚨 #1 BEST MW4 AR LOADOUT 🚨‼️ 🥇 The M4 is the #1 Best AR in #MW4 Beta after the update! https://t.co/anRDhuSuhj

    1.0K6511485K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#warzone#mw4#modernwarfare4#blackops7#bo7

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 505 interactions against 304K followers, an engagement rate of 0.166%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 54K times each, and 0.942% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 17.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 20x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #warzone, #mw4, #modernwarfare4.

What is Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG's engagement rate on X?
Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG (@WZStatsGG) has an engagement rate of 0.166%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 303,870 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.166%, Warzone Meta | WZStats.GG sits above the 50th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WZStatsGG have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WZStatsGG post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going