Back to @WWFFrance's profile

WWF France đŸŒ engagement report

@WWFFrance - 365K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 365K followers
Per impression
0.271%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 365K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.404% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 128 interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WWF France đŸŒ's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, WWF France đŸŒ sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video70% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 70% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 27, 202632x their median

    L’AssemblĂ©e nationale a achevĂ© de rĂ©viser le statut du loup dans la loi agricole Elle achĂšve le loup par la mĂȘme occasion car parmi les amendements adoptĂ©s : 1⃣Le tir de dĂ©fense est prĂ©sumĂ© lĂ©gitime 2⃣Sans condition de moyen de protection 3⃣Y compris dans les rĂ©serves naturelles https://t.co/KzAuuIxWBf

    19248415.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202632x their median

    Alors que l’avenir du loup est discutĂ© au SĂ©nat aujourd’hui, un sondage @IfopOpinion montre que les Français qui vivent au plus prĂšs des loups soutiennent massivement leur protection, sont opposĂ©s Ă  ce qu’on en abatte plus et Ă  ce qu’ils puissent ĂȘtre tirĂ©s dans les espaces protĂ©gĂ©s. https://t.co/8i7p9wQlTo

    8237611.7K viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 202614x their median

    Tout comme nous, la ministre @Ecologie_Gouv juge que les fondements du projet de ferme usine Pure Salmon visant à produire 10 000 t de saumons / an en Gironde ne tiennent pas la route. Monsieur @SebLecornu allez-vous trancher dans le bon sens
 ou opérer une sortie de route ? https://t.co/FgttbTMXlW

    123831450K viewsView on X
  • Apr 30, 20268.5x their median

    Dans le PJL agricole, beaucoup d'amendements pour tuer encore davantage de loups Comment la France pourra-t-elle dĂ©fendre la protection des lions ou des Ă©lĂ©phants Ă  l'international si elle autorise l’élimination d'une espĂšce protĂ©gĂ©e dans ses propres parcs nationaux et rĂ©serves ? https://t.co/qYUGNp24OB

    3919821.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202615x their median

    "Avant de construire des bassines, qui sont des ouvrages coĂ»teux pour des volumes d'eau pas si importants que cela au final et qu'il faut ensuite transporter, il faudrait commencer par mieux stocker l'eau dans les sols eux-mĂȘmes". https://t.co/nyzIy0CNfE https://t.co/EtIaGgbUuV

    26101855.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202612x their median

    Le grand tĂ©tras et le lagopĂšde alpin classĂ©s comme oiseaux protĂ©gĂ©s en France âžĄïž https://t.co/mbZ5Bbvad6 https://t.co/QKAx5fGHJG

    3710024.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 202611x their median

    Au moment oĂč les sĂ©cheresses s’aggravent, le SĂ©nat veut dĂ©sĂ©quilibrer la gouvernance de l'eau au profit des intĂ©rĂȘts agricoles et au dĂ©triment des Ă©lus locaux, des citoyens et de la biodiversitĂ©. L’eau est un bien commun, pas une ressource Ă  accaparer. https://t.co/JI91F7r5tv

    2313801.4K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202611x their median

    Cinq anciens ministres de l'Agriculture @SLeFoll @guillaumegarot @AgnesRunacher @MFesneau et @StTRAVERT se dressent contre les dispositions sur l'eau dans le projet de loi d'urgence agricole : "l’agriculture n'a pas besoin d'une nouvelle guerre de l'eau" https://t.co/KZJb2byXpM

    1817804.3K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 2026

    🚗 Face Ă  la flambĂ©e du pĂ©trole, l'Ă©lectrique devient de plus en plus logique pour le pouvoir d'achat. ⚡En France, les voitures Ă©lectriques atteignent un niveau record : 28 % des ventes neuves en mars, et +47 % pour l’occasion. https://t.co/Rl7HjY2G8z

    248732.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202610x their median

    💧 1,1 million de Français avec un approvisionnement en eau sous tension. 62 % des nappes sous les normales. La sĂ©cheresse actuelle le rappelle : l’eau n’est plus une ressource que l’on peut considĂ©rer comme acquise. Il faut changer d’échelle dans notre gestion de l’eau. https://t.co/648d82CYhP

    2510321.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 365K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.404% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 70% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 128 interactions, about 32x its own typical post.

What is WWF France đŸŒ's engagement rate on X?
WWF France đŸŒ (@WWFFrance) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 364,965 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, WWF France đŸŒ sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WWFFrance have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WWFFrance post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going