Back to @WSJopinion's profile

Wall Street Journal Opinion engagement report

@WSJopinion - 185K followers on X

Measured over 119 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 185K followers
Per impression
0.271%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
0.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 119 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.795% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 119 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 564 interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

Measured over 119 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Wall Street Journal Opinion's engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, Wall Street Journal Opinion sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 13, 2026141x their median

    Putin ignores that energy “cease-fire.” Trump announces a truce, but Russia immediately violates it. https://t.co/JwZjXN6y3k

    3861106175.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202651x their median

    Why is Britain still appeasing Iran? The regime plots terror attacks on U.K. soil and pays no price. https://t.co/DamEura3Ls

    132551446.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202618x their median

    The Russian refusal to accept an energy cease-fire is the latest evidence that President Trump’s courtship of Vladimir Putin isn’t working. https://t.co/xZ90ZU11N4

    4713911.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20268.8x their median

    Friends of free markets lament that we need, but can’t find, new Milton Friedmans to refute emboldened socialists. We might have better luck if we remembered what we are trying to find, writes Arthur M. Diamond https://t.co/s9mdDDBbCl

    236511.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20266.0x their median

    As dumb as tariffs are, retaliating with countertariffs, as Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is doing, is dumber still, writes @wjmcgurn https://t.co/uxmxoBU3wc

    172501.6K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.5x their median

    NATO’s message to Putin? “We will fight.” Gen. Alexus Grynkewich sends a strong deterrent message, but does Trump agree? https://t.co/YigT01BBft

    162401.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.5x their median

    Is anyone surprised that the University of California, Berkeley Law School is still using race preferences in admission, defying the Civil Rights Act, the Constitution and the Supreme Court? https://t.co/bV2wGG7mTP

    191202.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20265.3x their median

    Americans have long resisted a tax on wealth. If Californians cross this Prop. 40 Rubicon, get ready for a new era of wealth confiscation in America. https://t.co/Pr5ipqwKGU

    73832.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.5x their median

    The GOP has a growing number of Bo Frenches—and not only in Texas. These people are diminishing the Republican Party, not building it. I’ll have no part of it, writes @KarlRove https://t.co/byyon1HDbY

    112412.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.5x their median

    Can military morale survive smartphones? The crisis on the USS Lincoln illustrates the dangers of connectivity for U.S. service members, writes @SpencerGuard https://t.co/vuxH86s28y

    111204.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 119 original posts, its engagement rate beats 10% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 0.271% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.795% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 119 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 564 interactions, about 141x its own typical post.

What is Wall Street Journal Opinion's engagement rate on X?
Wall Street Journal Opinion (@WSJopinion) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 119 original posts from the last 30 days against 185,423 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, Wall Street Journal Opinion sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WSJopinion have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 10% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WSJopinion post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going