Back to @WHO's profile

World Health Organization (WHO) engagement report

@WHO - 13M followers on X

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 13M followers
Per impression
0.308%
77K views on a typical post
Reach
0.61%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
238
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.8/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 238 interactions against 13M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.612% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ebola, #drc, #worldhumanitarianday.

Measured over 98 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #ebola, #drc, #worldhumanitarianday.

Compared with accounts its own size

World Health Organization (WHO)'s engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, World Health Organization (WHO) sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 20266.6x their median

    Vaccines have saved more than 150 million lives since 1974 — not by accident, but because ordinary people made the decision to protect themselves, their children and one another. That’s 6 lives every minute, every day, for more than 5 decades. #VaccinesWork Your decision makes a difference. Get vaccinated.

    91543618734113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20265.9x their median

    Stress is not something to ignore. It makes it hard for us to relax and take decisions; it shoots up anxiety and irritation, and negatively impacts our overall health. Learn to spot the signs of stress and practice simple techniques that help you pause, breathe, and slow down. https://t.co/vPGZHY5d6C

    9843534429112K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.5x their median

    Every parent wants to keep their children safe, and vaccines are among the most powerful tools for doing that, making deadly diseases preventable. @WHO is concerned that recent changes to US immunization policy are not aligned with decades of evidence that show when children are most vulnerable to disease, when vaccines provide the strongest protection, how many doses are needed, and which vaccines can be given together safely. That evidence is reviewed continuously as new data emerge from across the globe. The current evidence is unequivocal: vaccines - including the MMR vaccine - are safe and do not cause autism. Delaying vaccines or separating doses unnecessarily does not make vaccination safer and can leave children unprotected. Global evidence and recommendations, including from @WHO, inform national experts, who consider local disease patterns, health systems and population needs, to determine which vaccines and schedules are best for their country. Vaccination policy should be guided by rigorous, independent and transparent review of the best available science, not by political influence.

    74538215438110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.1x their median

    WHO is on the ground in #Nepal, responding to the devastating flash floods delivering emergency care, and supplies where they are needed most. https://t.co/txf1FBKmyg

    8812515926230K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20263.2x their median

    Obrigado, President @LulaOficial and Health Minister @padilhando, for #Brazil's commitment to eliminating mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B. @DirOPSPAHO Jarbas Barbosa and I were pleased to receive Brazil's report and official request for @WHO validation for the elimination. Thank you for your leadership in protecting future generations from hepatitis. #WorldHepatitisDay

    539145502144K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.9x their median

    What are you doing today to take care of yourself and your health and well-being? These could be small habits. Or big changes. Every action you take to protect your health matters. https://t.co/blPQt81pYl

    420221251887K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    High blood pressure is a silent but serious threat — and knowing your numbers can save your life. Check your blood pressure regularly and track your readings over time. Aim to keep your blood pressure below 140/90 mmHg — and remember: the lower, the better for your heart, brain, and kidneys. Taking action today protects your health tomorrow. Know your numbers. Take control. Stay healthy.

    456169241485K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.5x their median

    Take actions to prevent strokes by adopting a healthier lifestyle: 🥗 eat healthier 🏃‍♀️ be physically active 💪 maintain a healthy weight 🚭 avoid tobacco & alcohol https://t.co/sEVwSo6l4k

    4171432619140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.3x their median

    Nothing online is really free. When you're not paying with money, you're usually paying with attention, and that shapes almost everything you see. Feeds don't show you what's most useful, they show you what's most likely to keep you watching. That doesn’t mean you log off for good. It means to notice the pull, question why something is in front of you and decide for yourself what's worth your time. Awareness is the first step to using platforms on your own terms.

    376150191181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20262.3x their median

    Last Friday, the @WHO humanitarian warehouse in Dnipro, #Ukraine, was struck and destroyed. At this time, no casualties have been reported. A WHO staff member and drivers had been on site earlier in the day supporting the evacuation of supplies. The team had succeeded in evacuating 130 of approximately 300 pallets and left the area before the attack. The warehouse held humanitarian medical supplies intended for frontline health facilities — primarily WHO emergency health supplies. I cannot say loudly enough: attacks on health care MUST STOP. Otherwise, people are deprived of lifesaving healthcare. Even wars have rules. One of those is that health must be protected!

    204892073888K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ebola#drc#worldhumanitarianday#breastfeeding#vaccineswork

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 238 interactions against 13M followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 98 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 77K times each, and 0.308% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.612% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 98 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.6K interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ebola, #drc, #worldhumanitarianday.

What is World Health Organization (WHO)'s engagement rate on X?
World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 98 original posts from the last 30 days against 12,670,503 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, World Health Organization (WHO) sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WHO have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WHO post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going