Wei Jingsheng魏京生 engagement report
@WEI_JINGSHENG - 225K followers on X
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 99 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 58% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 446 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.
Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Wei Jingsheng魏京生's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.044%, Wei Jingsheng魏京生 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 71% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 145 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 26, 20264.5x their median
最近常有五毛发出挑拨性的指责:民运应该仿照中共回到国内去拼命。很多人会被误导,不知道这里边的巨大区别。一战期间德国用八千万金马克支持列宁回国,扶植了布尔什维克上台为西方制造了近百年的敌人。之后俄国苏联多年财政支持中共回国,给愚蠢的美国资本家制造了新的绞索。现在美国用于中国的所谓支持民主自由的财政拨款,大都用来搞女权和同性恋项目以及发避孕套,不愿意动共产党的毫毛,生怕影响了生意。甚至流亡海外的民运人士必须用自己打工挣的钱自掏腰包抗议,还受到警察的干扰和暗算。这说明资本主义本身没有价值观和信仰,他们的信仰只有钱。这和共产党回国闹革命有任何可比性吗?希望有正义感的华人不要被五毛煽动蒙蔽了自己的初心,中了共党宣传的奸计。
- Sep 12, 20264.1x their median
大陆不民主台独不可能,大陆民主了台独没必要。这是我二十五年前在台湾说的话。
- Mar 8, 20232.4x their median
刚更新了推号内容,包括了通过Zelle给魏京生基金会捐款的电邮信箱:[email protected] 如给出联络方式,可获免税证明. Donations to the Wei Jingsheng Foundation is tax deductible. You may donate through Zelle at [email protected] give us a contact info to send you a receipt.
- Sep 24, 20262.3x their median
在中国国是会议举办的有关习近平访美及中国未来的新闻发布会上的讲话 -- 魏京生 2026年9月24日 最近媒体上传说习近平将下台。不管消息是否准确,但这的确是中外各界人们的愿望。犹如当年的口号“天下苦秦久矣”,现在的口号是“天下苦习久矣”。不但中国人民希望习近平下台,各国也都希望习近平下台,估计习近平政权下台确实不远了。 但是,习近平下台就万事大吉了吗?不一定。习近平下台并不等于一党专政的体制结束,并不等于民主自由的体制成功。这还存在着两种可能性:或者走向民主,或者继续一党专政。这个过程存在着不确定性,取决于各方的愿望和力量的博弈。 现在中共的镇压异常严酷。中国国内的社会一片沉寂,似乎没有异议人士的呼声了。但这只是被压抑的状况,时不时还是有瞬间爆发的事件传出。这说明民间蓄积的能量很强大。一旦时机合适,将会产生爆发性的事变。 另一方面中共政权内部的危机越来越大,整人遍及党政军各方面。最近几年已经打击到军队最高层,产生军事政变的可能性越来越大。即使少数高层军官们还能够忍受,中下层军人的思想情绪变化,也是最大的不稳定因素。 一旦星星之火燃烧起来 ,我们海外民运将成为促进革命的重要力量。我们从现在起就要做好准备,利用各种活动促进国际与国内的变化,为将来走向民主自由的制度添砖加瓦。 相关链接: https://t.co/aMDCyoApNf
- Sep 26, 20262.2x their median
这头怪兽是美国历届总统的短视和愚蠢所造成的https://t.co/GhZMzjbqyN不理解川普政府为什么如此夸张迎接地缘政治上最大的对手,华尔街大佬和硅谷科技新贵为什么痴迷于跟习近平同座一桌,那是因为他们都知道,今天的美国已经没有办法跟这头怪兽切割!而这头怪兽是美国历届总统的短视和愚蠢所造成的。
- Sep 7, 20261.9x their median
万润南先生去世快一年了。很多朋友正在筹划纪念他。老万是个温文尔雅的谦谦君子,他最可贵的品质就是愿意为了公众的事情牺牲自己的利益,挨骂受气来维护团体的团结。现在的中国人,其中很多只知道自己的困难,不会体谅别人的困难。很多都被共产党培养成为精致的利己主义者了,只知道索取不愿意贡献。我经常碰见要求别人做这个做那个的人,从来不说他自己该做什么。在这种情况下维持团体的团结非常困难。但老万坚持下来了,并且做得很好,任劳任怨,成为领导大家度过艰难困苦的领袖。这种品质非常难得,是我们大家学习的榜样。
- Aug 23, 20261.9x their median
最近中国政府为人们去银行取钱制造了很多种障碍。这是个很愚蠢的措施,不可能增加消费,只能迫使人们倾向于把现金存在自己手里。这样就使得很多本来可以在银行里通过贷款形式进入经济大循环的价值,被限制在循环之外。不能参加到创造新价值的循环中去。直接降低了经济增长的数量和速度。多年来政府限制兑换外汇也很愚蠢。把人民币兑换成外汇,这部分钱又回到银行里进入到经济大循环中去了,对经济增长没什么损失。限制兑换人们就利用地下渠道兑换,钱就进入到地下钱庄的小循环中去了。地下钱庄赚的钱不一定会拿去做有效的投资,不会都拿去消费。而是有一个他们自己的循环渠道,继续赚兑换的钱。这样它既不能增加消费,也不会增加有效投资创造新的价值。什么正面效果也没达到,实在很愚蠢。不知道现在掌握经济的人们是什么头脑,好像不是在保护经济大循环,保护经济发展。这种土财主式的思维方式,一直是中国经济主管部门的政策。反观经济发展最快的时期,也是金融方面最放得开的时期,金融促进经济最好的时期。
- Aug 23, 20261.7x their median
播中共国歌、挂五星红旗...国民党宴会?https://t.co/PR9H70N0hy“中国民主党国际联盟”主席界立建,今天在X平台曝光2段影片,可以看到宴席现场的投影幕放的虽然是国父孙中山的肖像,但播的居然是中国共产党的国歌,随后甚至直接放上中国五星红旗。
- Sep 16, 20261.7x their median
惊人预案曝光!美国开始准备“中共崩溃”https://t.co/4FW5cwUo4G所以,余茂春认为,中共虽然统治时间很长、中国体量巨大,但这并不意味着它永远不会遭遇突然的政治断裂。而一旦真的发生,问题恐怕远远不只是“谁来接班”。
- Sep 10, 20261.6x their median
点赞了你的帖子·4小时fucksart 一个说汉语仇视汉族的中国穆斯林:那个叫“馬聚”的是公开支持哈马斯屠殺的 https://t.co/sUTO0X7CLX
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 99 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.044%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.7K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 58% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 446 interactions, about 4.5x its own typical post.
- What is Wei Jingsheng魏京生's engagement rate on X?
- Wei Jingsheng魏京生 (@WEI_JINGSHENG) has an engagement rate of 0.044%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 224,525 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.044%, Wei Jingsheng魏京生 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @WEI_JINGSHENG have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @WEI_JINGSHENG post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.