Back to @WClemente's profile

Will engagement report

@WClemente - 795K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.093%
of 795K followers
Per impression
1.26%
58K views on a typical post
Reach
7.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
739
interactions (median)
Saved
0.08%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.27/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 739 interactions against 795K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Will's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, Will sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.431%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.431%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,137 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.431%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%51K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%71K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%93K
14:00 UTC-3%96K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%229K
Monday0%284K
Tuesday-2%273K
Wednesday-1%250K
Thursday-2%243K
Friday-3%251K
Saturday+3%226K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20265.0x their median

    The President just said that the United States is considering buying sizable amounts of Bitcoin on live television. https://t.co/ZmupIwBs9E

    3.3K25613456395K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.5x their median

    If you have more than 0.3 BTC you have more than it is physically possible for every millionaire on earth to own

    2.4K987915131K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    For the the first time in what feels like forever, Bitcoin has now put in multiple daily closes above all major exponential moving averages (20, 50, 200) on 4 major asset pairs: BTC/USD, BTC/GOLD, BTC/SPY, BTC/QQQ. https://t.co/zXsOrwHhFc

    1.8K130421274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.5x their median

    Technicals on weekly timeframe for BTC acting similar to late 2022. Sell off into prior cycle all time highs with first oversold reading in years, bleeding into a bull divergence for price/momentum. https://t.co/Oo7V35AW8x

    1.6K1789914215K viewsView on X
  • Feb 22, 20262.3x their median

    https://t.co/mj9NTYKmDP

    1.3K31611243487K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.3x their median

    Mark Walter basically showed the private credit Ponzi game is ending People finally admitting AI doesn't drive productivity or GDP growth Dario Amodei is becoming the most hated man in America, and his last ditch effort was to claim he could solve cancer. Then we solved cancer without him. US30y complete retrace of yield curve control attempt Thiel hiding out in Argentina Different game developing

    1.6K915615166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.1x their median

    Bitcoin denominated in Gold has been in a giant range for over 5 years now. After several months of chopping around at the lows, looks like it has now printed a deviation + reclaim, exactly what long term holders would want to see for now. https://t.co/vB459DIVst

    1.3K1057214122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.1x their median

    The Bitcoin thesis is playing out live in our faces but most people have been conditioned to become too cynical and jaded to believe it

    1.4K5939665K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.6x their median

    All time high correlation between bitcoin and gold https://t.co/QPfotN1no3

    1.0K755221129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.6x their median

    Coming back to BTC and heavily allocating while everyone gave up right before the biggest short squeeze in recent memory. https://t.co/r3WiWSfN4z

    1.1K2244254K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 739 interactions against 795K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 3,739 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 58K times each, and 1.26% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.7K interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Will's engagement rate on X?
Will (@WClemente) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 794,974 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, Will sits above the 50th percentile of the 36,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WClemente have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,739 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WClemente post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going