Back to @WBGPubs's profile

World Bank Group Publications engagement report

@WBGPubs - 156K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.011%
of 156K followers
Per impression
1.90%
894 views on a typical post
Reach
0.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.224%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 894 times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.573% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134 interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #latinamerica, #eastasiapacific, #wdr2026.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #latinamerica, #eastasiapacific, #wdr2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

World Bank Group Publications's engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 62% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, World Bank Group Publications sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,233 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,048 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 274 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 20267.9x their median

    #IndustrialPolicy takes time to deliver results. Productivity gains and learning-by-doing don’t happen overnight—and ending policies too early can limit their impact. Patience, accountability, and evidence matter: https://t.co/EkteRCJ4us https://t.co/FZGX8SrcpW

    9336144.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.2x their median

    Most of the conversation about #AI focuses on risk and displacement. But what does the evidence actually show for developing economies? Read the World Bank Group's most comprehensive assessment of AI: The Promise of Artificial Intelligence — #WDR2026 ➡️ https://t.co/yGpgbY4oft https://t.co/7aKj0NW3G3

    6438214.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.0x their median

    The evidence on AI and developing economies is more nuanced — and more promising — than most headlines suggest. ➡️ https://t.co/yGpgbY4oft #WDR2026 https://t.co/1hvU6loWoB

    5423713.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20264.0x their median

    The world today looks nothing like it did 30 years ago, and the conventional wisdom on #IndustrialPolicy needs to catch up. In his latest blog @IndermitGill offers a frank and practical framework for getting it right. ✍️: https://t.co/q4W8jLXvVk 📘 Book: https://t.co/EkteRCJ4us https://t.co/Xu8vZE0Oxk

    4025212.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20263.3x their median

    JUST LAUNCHED | How can countries raise the revenue needed to finance development while building tax systems that are both efficient and fair? 📘 https://t.co/T6UwN66ptG https://t.co/E59WQxGSXx

    3122212.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.6x their median

    📱 AI adoption is rising fast, especially in middle-income countries, but innovation remains concentrated in high-income markets. Open-source tools are creating new opportunities for adaptation and local use. Explore: https://t.co/wcgfn9akuR #WBGAIFoundations https://t.co/xDwjGxeWhH

    3013011.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.2x their median

    Developing economies face an unprecedented investment gap. Meeting key global development goals will require 5% of global GDP annually through 2030. How can countries balance soaring needs with dwindling resources? https://t.co/QfRiMMaLp1 #Investment #DevEcon https://t.co/gmHm6hIEAS

    2214111.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20262.2x their median

    Every child deserves a prepared #teacher. Our new global study explores how Initial Teacher Education (ITE) shapes the subject knowledge, pedagogical skills & professional identity teachers need to help students master the basics: https://t.co/IVNvKwGdjG https://t.co/blHCJED5mL

    279102.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.7x their median

    Investing in a low-carbon economy = more green jobs, innovation & resilience. #LatinAmerica & the #Caribbean can lead the way in this transformative change. Discover the opportunities: https://t.co/7COt6rIY8w 👉 Informe disponible también en español. https://t.co/QrjImATrN8

    1711102.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.6x their median

    The transition to a low-carbon economy can generate millions of #GreenJobs in #LatinAmerica and the #Caribbean. Discover how the region can lead the change through innovation, investment, and strong institutions: https://t.co/7COt6rIY8w 📌 Informe disponible también en español. https://t.co/mkD5UIIOBo

    1511112.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#latinamerica#eastasiapacific#wdr2026#caribbean#water

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 156K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 23% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 894 times each, and 1.90% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.573% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134 interactions, about 7.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #latinamerica, #eastasiapacific, #wdr2026.

What is World Bank Group Publications's engagement rate on X?
World Bank Group Publications (@WBGPubs) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 155,944 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, World Bank Group Publications sits above the 10th percentile of the 157,233 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WBGPubs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 23% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WBGPubs post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going