Back to @WAX_io's profile

WAX engagement report

@WAX_io - 260K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 260K followers
Per impression
0.657%
4.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
28
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WAX's engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, WAX sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link54% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 54% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 178 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    🎁 Show Us What You're Collecting Drop your wallet address below for a shot at a small WAXP thank-you. We'll pick a few replies this week. https://t.co/nTiBOJV1uO

    46164116.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.9x their median

    📢 NEW: AtomicAssets v2 is coming! The new asset standard lands on WAX this September. Mutable template fields, deletable empty templates, flexible RAM payers, and dynamic royalty splits enforced by the protocol. Visit https://t.co/MOYNoqdTWY.

    407505.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    🗓️ August Really Said "Debug This." One month, forty bugs, and at least three of them were actually just a missing semicolon. GM WAXFAM https://t.co/2LmSmjcs3F

    294504.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    🛠️ Happy Labor Day To everyone who builds, ships, tests, and then fixes it again at 2am. The chain runs because people put in the work. https://t.co/D8lzsWCvSy

    266504.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026

    🧙 A New Month, A Fresh Block "All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us." Gandalf never touched a keyboard, but he understood shipping. GM WAXFAM https://t.co/GOmHMMn2GY

    256404.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    🥄 There Is No Spoon Neo learned reality bends once you stop believing in limits. Same goes for what you can build on WAX. GM WAXFAM https://t.co/1uOIlASfGG

    265404.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    🔍 Don't Trust, Verify Every transfer, every contract call, every account on WAX is public and checkable. WAXBlock is where you go to check it. Visit https://t.co/FLWxh7uy9j https://t.co/q0p9Z6aXMc

    265204.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    📈 Small Steps, Real Rewards Every block adds up. Stake your WAXP, keep your vote active, and watch the rewards add up over time. Stake at https://t.co/mCpuAHgWi3 https://t.co/BzksnZtI1E

    236404.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    💰 September Just Started. Your WAXP Can Too. Nearly 10% APY for staking WAXP and keeping your vote active. New month, same steady rewards. Visit https://t.co/mCpuAHgWi3 https://t.co/rBsvymQSgA

    265014.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    🔐 Cloud Wallet Just Got a Vault A bigger upgrade than the name suggests. Here is what changed and why it matters for how you store what you own. Visit https://t.co/8F2QCAmKpY

    246105.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.3K times each, and 0.657% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 54% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 104 interactions, about 3.7x its own typical post.

What is WAX's engagement rate on X?
WAX (@WAX_io) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 260,414 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, WAX sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WAX_io have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WAX_io post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going