Back to @WANIMAL912's profile

WANIMAL | Official engagement report

@WANIMAL912 - 784K followers on X

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.195%
of 784K followers
Per impression
2.46%
62K views on a typical post
Reach
7.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.396%
246 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 784K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #shin_hanga, #新版画.

Measured over 31 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #art, #shin_hanga, #新版画.

Compared with accounts its own size

WANIMAL | Official's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.195%, WANIMAL | Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.437%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20266.0x their median

    SELFIE WANIMATE @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/Yb3GzqcZQZ

    8.8K414150156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.6x their median

    🍌 WANIMATE @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/Myg3Hszh4N

    6.6K394141187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    WANIMAL NEW COMER @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/lLOyiQsTrL

    4.0K1770095K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.8x their median

    2026 WANIMATE @Butterflyy0007 @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/oR52My4P3G

    4.0K2132098K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.5x their median

    WANIMAL NEW COMER @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/oA7Kwv8i4y

    3.7K1418086K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.4x their median

    2026 WANIMATE @Butterflyy0007 @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/sPYu96Prs8

    3.5K19781103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.3x their median

    WANIMATE @Butterflyy0007 @ReneeDoll00 https://t.co/Ptcg4mY2g1

    3.5K13810103K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20262.3x their median

    2026 SHANGHAI WANIMATE @Yoga_miao_ https://t.co/wIm2OiwBOU

    3.4K1574088K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.1x their median

    暑 WANIMATE @Butterflyy0007 https://t.co/t75XRNMf3k

    3.1K19010104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.9x their median

    2023 WANIMATE @Wendi0922 https://t.co/H9h5vosPne

    2.8K1080058K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#art#shin_hanga#新版画#本日の不美人画

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 784K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 31 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 62K times each, and 2.46% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 31 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.2K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #art, #shin_hanga, #新版画.

What is WANIMAL | Official's engagement rate on X?
WANIMAL | Official (@WANIMAL912) has an engagement rate of 0.195%, based on the median interactions across 31 original posts from the last 30 days against 783,688 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.195%, WANIMAL | Official sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @WANIMAL912 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @WANIMAL912 post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going