Back to @W83Xl's profile

๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž engagement report

@W83Xl - 217K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.048%
of 217K followers
Per impression
0.587%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
8.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
104
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.27/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.587% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 611x its own typical post.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.048%, ๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video90% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 135 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026611x their median

    ๆœ€่ฟ‘ไผšใ†ๅ‹ไบบใ€ไผšใ†ๅ‹ไบบๅ…จๅ“กใซใ€ŒSAVASใ‚’้ฃฒใ‚๏ผ๏ผใƒ—ใƒญใƒ†ใ‚คใƒณใ‚’ๆ‘‚ใ‚‹ใ‚“ใ ๏ผใŠๅ‰ใฎ็ฉบ่…นใฏ้Œฏ่ฆšใชใ‚“ใ ใƒจใ‚ฉใ€œ๏ผ็ด™ใƒ‘ใƒƒใ‚ฏใฎSAVASใ‚ฟใƒณใƒ‘ใ‚ฏ่ณช15gใ‚’้ฃฒใ‚“ใงใ€ๅกฉๅˆ†ใ‚‚็ ‚็ณ–ใ‚‚็ฆๆญขใฎใƒžใƒƒใ‚ธใ‚ฃ็ด ็„ผใใฎใ‚ฏใƒซใƒŸใ‚’10g(ใฒใจใคใพใฟใปใฉ)ใ‚’้ฃŸใˆ๏ผ๏ผใ“ใ‚Œใง็ฉบ่…นๆ„ŸใŒๆถˆใˆใŸใ‚‰ๆ „้คŠไธ่ถณใชใ ใ‘๏ผๅฝ็‰ฉใฎ็ฉบ่…นใซ้จ™ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใช๏ผใ€ใ‚’่จ€ใฃใฆใ‚‹

    57K6.0K465696.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026344x their median

    ็„กๅฐ่‰ฏๅ“ใฎใƒกใƒƒใ‚ทใƒฅใƒ”ใƒณใ‚ฏใ€็ญ†็ฎฑใŒๅ‡บใ‚‹ใฟใŸใ„ https://t.co/2Xd6cOE4jm

    33K1.8K299772.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202645x their median

    ๅคซใจไผŠๅ‹ขไธนใง่ฒทใ„็‰ฉใ€‚yokochanใงใ“ใฎๆœใจใ“ใฎๆœ่ฟทใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ€œใจ่จ€ใฃใŸใ‚‰ใ€Œใฉใฃใกใใฆใ‚‚ใƒ–ใ‚นใฏๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‰ใญใˆใ‘ใฉใ‚ใ‚“ใฉใใ•ใ„ใ—ใฉใฃใกใ‚‚่ฒทใˆใ‚ˆใ€‚ไป–ใซใ‚‚ใ„ใ‚‹ใ‚‚ใฎใ‚ใ‚Œใฐ่ฒทใˆใƒ–ใ‚นใ€‚ใ€ใจ่จ€ใ‚ใ‚ŒใŸw ๆ„Ÿ่ฆš้บป็—บใ—ใฆใใฆใƒ–ใ‚นๆˆ‘ๆ…ขใ—ใŸใ‚‰ใ„ใ„ๅฅดใ˜ใ‚ƒใญwww

    4.5K93191072.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    ๅฑฑๆœฌ้‡Œ่œใ‚ขใƒŠใŒใƒใƒชๅณถๆ—…่กŒใง็€ใฆใ‚‹็งๆœใŒๅฏๆ„›้ŽใŽใฆ็‰นๅฎšใ—ใŸโ€ฆโ€ผ๏ธ ใพใ•ใ‹ใฎSHIENใ€ไธŠไธ‹ใ‚ปใƒƒใƒˆใง1000ๅ††โœ๏ธโœจ ๅ…จใใƒ—ใƒใƒ—ใƒฉใซ่ฆ‹ใˆใชใใฆใ“ใ‚Œใฏ่ฒทใ„โ€ฆโ€ผ๏ธ ๅ“็•ช:sz2403191771742339๐Ÿ–ค https://t.co/HkkMHMTRaX

    2.1K10635425K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    ใ‚ตใƒŠร—aloใŒ็พŽใ—้ŽใŽใ€‚3ๆžš็›ฎใฎใ•ใ‚Šใ’ใชใ„aloใ‚‚ใƒญใ‚ดใ‚ใฃใกใ‚ƒๅฏๆ„›ใ„ใ€‚ https://t.co/kN7IvOZJuA

    2.1K4763369K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202616x their median

    anuans 2026 A/Wๅฑ•็คบไผš๐Ÿ‚โŸก.ยท*. ใ“ใฎใ‚ญใƒฃใƒŸใƒฏใƒณใƒ”ใจใ‚ซใƒผใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใ‚ฌใƒณใฎๅˆใ‚ใ›ใŒๆใ‚ใ—ใๅฏๆ„›ใ‹ใฃใŸใ€ๅฏ’ใ•ใŒๆ‹ใ—ใ„ https://t.co/q4FbfMWp5g

    1.6K78315166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202611x their median

    ใƒใƒฃใƒผใ‚ญใƒผ่กŒใฃใŸใ‚‰ใ“ใ‚Œ่ฒทใˆ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿ‘กโ€ผ๏ธ ไปŠใพใงใƒ‘ใƒณใƒ—ใ‚นใฎใƒ’ใƒผใƒซ้ƒจๅˆ†ใฎ้ฉใŒๅ‰ฅใ’ใฆใฏไฟฎ็†ใ‚’็นฐใ‚Š่ฟ”ใ—ใฆใŸใ‘ใฉใ€ใ“ใ‚Œใฏใƒ’ใƒผใƒซ้ƒจๅˆ†ใŒใƒกใ‚ฟใƒซใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‹ใ‹ใ‚‰ๅ‰ฅใ’ใพใ›ใ‚“โ—๏ธ ใƒ‰ใƒ–ใซใƒ’ใƒผใƒซ้ƒจๅˆ†็ชใฃ่พผใ‚“ใงใ‚‚็„กๅ‚ทโ—๏ธ ใƒžใ‚ธใง็ฅž็ฅž็ฅžโ€ผ๏ธโ€ผ๏ธ้ฉไฟฎ็†ใ‹ใ‚‰ใŠใ•ใ‚‰ใฐ๐Ÿ–๏ธโ€ผ๏ธ https://t.co/XvHA4JrCFs

    1.0K590475K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.9x their median

    ใชใ‚“ใจใชใใงใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒ•ใƒฅใƒผใ‚ถใƒผ็ฝฎใ„ใฆใ‚‹ไบบใ€œโ€ผ๏ธ ๅฎŸใฏใฉใ“ใซ็ฝฎใใ‹ใง็›ธๆ€งใฎ่‰ฏใ„้ฆ™ใ‚Š็ตๆง‹ๅค‰ใ‚ใ‚‹ใ‚‰ใ—ใ„ใ€‚ ๆ—ฅๆœฌใงใ‚‚้Ÿ“ๅ›ฝใงใ‚‚ใƒใ‚บใ‚Šใพใใฃใฆใ‚‹ใƒ˜ใƒˆใƒฉใ‚นใฎใƒ‡ใ‚ฃใƒ•ใƒฅใƒผใ‚ถใƒผใฎ้ฆ™ใ‚Šใ€ใŠ้ƒจๅฑ‹ๅˆฅใซๅˆ†ใ‘ใฆใฟใŸ๐Ÿชž https://t.co/h8Owx7dgOJ

    86352310672K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20265.5x their median

    ใ‚นใ‚ญใƒณใ‚ฑใ‚ขๆฅฝใ—ใใชใ‚‹ใ‚ˆใ†ใซๅฟต้ก˜ใฎใ‚นใ‚ญใƒณใ‚ฑใ‚ขใฎใ‚ฏใƒญใƒผใ‚ผใƒƒใƒˆไฝœใฃใฆใฟใŸ๏ผ ใ‚ฏใƒฌใƒณใ‚ธใƒณใ‚ฐใ‚ชใ‚คใƒซ่พžใ‚ใฆใ‚ขใƒŒใ‚ขใฎใƒ”ใƒผใƒชใƒณใ‚ฐใ‚ปใƒฉใƒ ไฝฟใ„ๅง‹ใ‚ใฆใ‹ใ‚‰ๆœฌๅฝ“ใซ่‚Œ่ชฟๅญ่‰ฏใ„ใ€œใ€œ๏พ๏ฝฐ๏ฝฐ๏ฝฐ๏ฝฐ๏ฝผ๏พžใคใ‚‹ใฃใคใ‚‹๐Ÿฅš https://t.co/OAgIudOzxH

    53420615476K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20263.3x their median

    ใƒ€ใƒ“ใƒณใกใ‚ƒใ‚“ๆถ™่ข‹ใƒ•ใ‚ฃใƒฉใƒผๅ…ฅใ‚ŒใŸใฃใฆๅ‹˜้•ใ„ใ•ใ‚Œใ‚‹ใใ‚‰ใ„ๆถ™่ข‹ใƒกใ‚คใ‚ฏไธŠๆ‰‹ใใฆใ€่ถ…่ถ…ๆฐ—ใซใชใฃใฆใŸใฎโ€ฆใคใ„ใซใƒกใ‚คใ‚ฏใƒฌใ‚ทใƒ”ใ‚ใ’ใฆใใ‚Œใฆๆœฌๅฝ“ใซ็ฅžโ€ฆโœจ ใƒซใƒใ‚ฏใƒˆใฎใ‚ฆใ‚ฉใƒผใƒ ๏ผ‹ใ‚ฏใƒผใƒซใ‚’Wไฝฟใ„โ—๏ธ https://t.co/A97iNnJNbT

    303351025K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 217K followers, an engagement rate of 0.048%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 0.587% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video and 50% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 611x its own typical post.

What is ๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž's engagement rate on X?
๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž (@W83Xl) has an engagement rate of 0.048%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 217,371 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.048%, ๐™ฎ๐™ช๐™ข๐™š๐™ฅ๐™ฅ๐™ž sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @W83Xl have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @W83Xl post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going