Back to @Vox35112635's profile

跑调的毕加索 engagement report

@Vox35112635 - 315K followers on X

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 315K followers
Per impression
0.403%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
6.24%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
79
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.1/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 315K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 90 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

跑调的毕加索's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 22% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, 跑调的毕加索 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 28 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 10, 202646x their median

    新一期的抽奖给大家送一台哈曼卡顿琉璃四代蓝牙音箱,自己用的这个听歌感觉效果还是蛮好的,关注➕评论➕点赞即可参与,10月10日的时候还是用AI在评论区抽一个幸运宝贝送一台,感谢大家长久的支持!希望大家喜欢!! https://t.co/4MXGRc6cDB

    1.8K1271.8K3158K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202639x their median

    ? https://t.co/PHDGXc0E7w

    2.7K6827420421K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202636x their median

    新一期的抽奖给大家送一台Marshall马歇尔Stanmore三代蓝牙音箱,这次换个牌子的送嘿嘿,关注➕评论➕点赞即可参与,11月11日的时候还是用AI在评论区抽一个幸运宝贝送一台,感谢大家长久的支持!希望大家喜欢!! https://t.co/KgkZqGeIhz

    1.4K1081.3K2113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202630x their median

    上次给大家抽这个反馈还挺好的,看来大家喜欢实用的东西哈哈哈,那我再来一次。这次奖品抽个实用一点的亚朵的床上用品。我前段时间一直失眠,换了之后真的睡的舒服了好多,睡眠质量也上去了,觉得真的很好用就给大家送一套!点赞+关注+评论参与抽奖,9月10日评论区用AI抽,拒绝黑幕!谢谢大家长久以来的支持!!

    975591.4K2373K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202618x their median

    ? https://t.co/Pl6QCSPKsu

    1.3K191559131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202617x their median

    哥们儿是挺反差的嗷 https://t.co/jBWMMcQANu

    988143594146K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202613x their median

    抽五个100现金红包 一周后AI开奖 https://t.co/KfzdJNLM58

    2741750041K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202611x their median

    https://t.co/eD7VXE3e5f

    69931898181K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202611x their median

    咋这么搞笑 https://t.co/WGuWnVZnBf

    6205206156K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20269.2x their median

    https://t.co/qVXt88NoGL

    44222736128K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 79 interactions against 315K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 90 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.403% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 90 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is 跑调的毕加索's engagement rate on X?
跑调的毕加索 (@Vox35112635) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 90 original posts from the last 30 days against 314,909 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, 跑调的毕加索 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Vox35112635 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Vox35112635 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going