Back to @VilaWeb's profile

VilaWeb engagement report

@VilaWeb - 360K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 360K followers
Per impression
0.212%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 360K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.392% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 179 interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

VilaWeb's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, VilaWeb sits below the 10th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202660x their median

    📝 "La consellera confon deliberadament dues coses que ja fa un segle i mig que la democràcia europea ha aclarit que són diferents: la culpa i la responsabilitat. I això és una manipulació indigna" Editorial de @vpartal https://t.co/AUPvk7ydDY https://t.co/AUPvk7ydDY

    9679042.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202611x their median

    💰 "A Catalunya, fins al juliol, han vingut 1,5 turistes per cada català; al País Valencià, 1,4; i a les Illes, 7,5 (!) per a cada illenc." 🔶 La píndola de @jordigoula https://t.co/0XrnqCBdnb https://t.co/0XrnqCBdnb

    1417112.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.7x their median

    📝 Cap a un nou independentisme de masses: apunts previs a les mobilitzacions de la Diada. 🔶 Opinió contundent de @carlesral i Gerard Boix https://t.co/TqC64ARmV7 https://t.co/TqC64ARmV7

    154101.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.3x their median

    🗣️ “Per guanyar la batalla de la llengua, hem de passar pel conflicte” 🔶 VilaWeb publica ‘Sortir a guanyar’, una guia de @pauetvidal per a la batalla lingüística de cada dia https://t.co/v1SqHCv5d0 https://t.co/v1SqHCv5d0

    109001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.7x their median

    ‼️ La violència ambiental de Marchena es posa a prova demà a Estrasburg. 🔶 És previst que el TEDH publiqui la sentència sobre el cas d'Aturem el Parlament https://t.co/KpVU2MCUN5 https://t.co/KpVU2MCUN5

    93201.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.3x their median

    ‼️ S’empesquen una nova maniobra per a impedir l’amnistia de Puigdemont i Junqueras al Tribunal de Comptes. 🔶 Societat Civil Catalana demana al Tribunal de Comptes que aclareixi l'origen dels diners de l'1-O investigats https://t.co/zeKExNWiwv https://t.co/zeKExNWiwv

    55001.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    🔴La jutgessa María Elósegui, la mà espanyola que ha aturat la demanda del president Torra per Pegasus. 🔶Forma part del comitè de tres membres del tribunal que ha refusat la segona demanda del president pel Catalangate https://t.co/DaoYHTb2O3 https://t.co/DaoYHTb2O3

    14211.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    ‼️Nou cas de discriminació lingüística al servei de lloguer de cotxes de l’aeroport del Prat. 🔶Tota la informació, ací ⬇️ https://t.co/n9pGhnb98A

    25011.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    🔴 Marlaska demana a la policia espanyola si és veritat que hi ha un informe que acusa el Marroc de dirigir la crisi de Ceuta 🔶 Reclama saber si el CENIF va avisar l'Audiència espanyola sobre l'origen marroquí de l'entrada en massa https://t.co/8Uh9qV9JVp https://t.co/8Uh9qV9JVp

    2130919 viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    📢 Guia de la Diada 2026: tot allò que heu de saber de la manifestació de l’Onze de Setembre. 🔶 Les mobilitzacions, descentralitzades, es faran a Barcelona, Girona i Amposta i tindran per lema "Hi soc. Hi som. Independència" https://t.co/ljF9Dt50aw https://t.co/ljF9Dt50aw

    24001.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 360K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 0.212% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.392% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 179 interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

What is VilaWeb's engagement rate on X?
VilaWeb (@VilaWeb) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 360,381 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, VilaWeb sits below the 10th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VilaWeb have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VilaWeb post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going