Back to @VicenteLaparra's profile

Vicente Laparra engagement report

@VicenteLaparra - 56K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.02%
of 56K followers
Per impression
1.45%
793 views on a typical post
Reach
1.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.063%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 56K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 793 times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vicente Laparra's engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 48% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, Vicente Laparra sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 267 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 13, 20262.8x their median

    Siempre ocupado. Nunca tiempo para nada propio. Y una angustia sorda que no cedía. El maestro preguntó: ¿Está ocupado o está huyendo? No era falta de tiempo. Era miedo a lo que aparece cuando el tiempo sobra. https://t.co/wfqvij63uB

    26701917 viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.3x their median

    Años intentándolo. Al final la decisión de parar. Y una tristeza que nadie sabía cómo nombrar porque tampoco había palabras para eso. La maestra preguntó: ¿Has llorado lo que no fue o solo lo que no pudo ser? https://t.co/mZVkeAGuzO

    226001.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.3x their median

    Siempre cedía para evitar conflictos. Y un día no supo qué quería porque hacía años que no lo preguntaba. El maestro preguntó: ¿Cedes por paz o porque ya no recuerdas qué preferías? No era flexibilidad. Era desaparición gradual disfrazada de buen carácter. https://t.co/PJc5ku2S8H

    234001.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20262.0x their median

    Tenía los mismos miedos que su madre. Las mismas reacciones que su padre. Y no sabía dónde terminaban ellos y empezaba él. El maestro preguntó: ¿Cuánto de lo que sientes es tuyo y cuánto lo heredaste? No era carácter. Era historia familiar cargada sin revisarla. https://t.co/xullAuYgsS

    19500943 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.8x their median

    Podía con todo solo. Hasta que no pudo. El maestro preguntó: ¿Pedir ayuda te hace débil o simplemente humano? No era fortaleza. Era soledad elegida por orgullo. https://t.co/lXXVCqTgdF

    21100904 viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20261.8x their median

    Veinte años de estrés laboral. El cuerpo lo había registrado todo sin decírselo directamente. El maestro preguntó: ¿Cuánto de lo que sientes en el cuerpo es tuyo y cuánto es del trabajo? No era vejez. Era una cuenta pendiente que el cuerpo había estado guardando con paciencia. https://t.co/A4yC3wy1KM

    16410626 viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.8x their median

    Cincuenta años mirando hacia adelante. Un día miró atrás y no reconoció el camino. El maestro preguntó: ¿Viviste esos años o solo los atravesaste? No era nostalgia. Era darse cuenta de que había estado presente en muy pocos de los momentos que ya no volverían. https://t.co/vemJGamGQW

    19200701 viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 20261.8x their median

    Dos años después de perder su trabajo, seguía sintiéndose fracasado. La maestra preguntó: ¿Le dio el duelo que merecía o pasó página sin mirar? No era fracaso. Era un duelo sin ceremonia. Las pérdidas que no se lloran no desaparecen. Se instalan. https://t.co/Am9r0Vc0Rs

    17400802 viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.7x their median

    Cuando algo bueno llegaba, esperaba que se rompiera. No podía simplemente disfrutarlo. La maestra preguntó: ¿Cuándo aprendiste que la alegría siempre viene seguida de algo malo? No era pesimismo. Era un cuerpo entrenado para anticipar el golpe antes de que llegara. https://t.co/Er8aj2XEao

    17300862 viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.7x their median

    No tomaba decisiones por miedo a equivocarse. Y la parálisis era el error más grande de todos. El maestro preguntó: ¿Cuánto te ha costado ya no decidir? No era prudencia. Era miedo disfrazado de espera. https://t.co/siv8d3v7Ks

    17300816 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 56K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 793 times each, and 1.45% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions, about 2.8x its own typical post.

What is Vicente Laparra's engagement rate on X?
Vicente Laparra (@VicenteLaparra) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 56,215 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, Vicente Laparra sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VicenteLaparra have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VicenteLaparra post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going