Back to @VicLombardi's profile

Vic Lombardi engagement report

@VicLombardi - 174K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.072%
of 174K followers
Per impression
0.642%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
11.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
125
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 125 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 180x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncoscountry, #chiefskingdom, #transformationthursday.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #broncoscountry, #chiefskingdom, #transformationthursday.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vic Lombardi's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.072%, Vic Lombardi sits above the 25th percentile of the 158,036 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.605%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,036 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,981 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.605%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 162 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026180x their median

    Bo Nix had an Average Depth of Target of 3.86 yards in week 1. For reference: the average American watches TV from about 3.67 yards away. https://t.co/YBwtJ5Ci39

    21K1.5K1613176.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202623x their median

    Travis Kelce wasn't messing around pre-game ahead of MNF against the Broncos #ChiefsKingdom | #BroncosCountry https://t.co/16fW5yVWpz

    2.5K2222873663K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.8x their median

    What is this?

    3426126231K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.2x their median

    Running backs still matter. The league doesn’t wanna pay RB’s like they used to, but the good ones deserve every penny. Kenneth Walker has carried these Chiefs tonight. Mahomes is along for the ride. Walker has been remarkable. Broncos couldn’t tackle @DMacSportsCO right now.

    363732223K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.4x their median

    “Can we talk about it?” 😂 https://t.co/hAm0elXvJ8

    2602091332K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.6x their median

    The Cavaliers are on the hook for $1.8 million in dead cap for each of the next three seasons after acquiring and subsequently waiving Cam Whitmore from WAS in ... the Peyton Watson sign-and-trade. Now the Nuggets are scooping up Whitmore for a $0 cap hit: https://t.co/PvVlrp3MLC

    17594956K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Upon deep reflection during lunch at Mamma’s house, I’m thoroughly convinced week one of the NFL season is not to be taken seriously. More fluke than feast. https://t.co/AYSNo7PDjw

    146015111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    The wife and I watch several shows together but our favorite — believe it or not — Chad Powers. So stupid. Yet, so funny.

    11851109.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    You watching TNF?Gotta be able to run the ball to win in the NFL.

    11211418.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    Some NHL owners reportedly favoring Houston over Austin for expansion franchise due to TV market https://t.co/nacow92Y6w

    941310834K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#broncoscountry#chiefskingdom#transformationthursday#wokeuplikethis

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 125 interactions against 174K followers, an engagement rate of 0.072%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.642% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 180x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncoscountry, #chiefskingdom, #transformationthursday.

What is Vic Lombardi's engagement rate on X?
Vic Lombardi (@VicLombardi) has an engagement rate of 0.072%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 173,727 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.072%, Vic Lombardi sits above the 25th percentile of the 158,036 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VicLombardi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VicLombardi post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going