Vibes Foot engagement report
@VibesFoot - 772K followers on X
Measured over 171 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 772K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 171 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 171 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.
Measured over 171 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Vibes Foot's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 68% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.026%, Vibes Foot sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 1% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 202651x their median
๐ฃ๏ธ ยซ ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฬ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ ยป ๐2โฃ9โฃ Bradley Barcola explique pourquoi il porte le numรฉro 29 : ยซ Quand jโรฉtais plus jeune, je jouais ร FIFA. ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐น๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐ต๐ถ๐๐๐ผ๐ถ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ ๐๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ, ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ป๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ผ ๐ฎ๐ต ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐๐บ๐ฏ๐ผ๐น๐ถ๐พ๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐บ๐ผ๐ถ. ๐ฎ Je me suis dit : โLe jour oรน je passerai pro, ce sera le 29.โ Je lโai adoptรฉ, et ๐ท๐ฒ ๐ป๐ฒ ๐น๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎฬ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ ๐ท๐ฎ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐. ยป ๐ฅน
- Sep 28, 202643x their median
๐ด ๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฆ'๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฃ๐ข๐ฆ๐ ๐๐จ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐ฉ๐จ๐ ๐'๐จ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐ฬ๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐'๐๐ง๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐๐๐๐ก ! ๐โค๏ธ Hansi Flick prรฉfรจre que le club se tourne vers une option plus jeune. ๐๏ธ @elnacionalcat https://t.co/4IShuSJf7n
- Aug 31, 202632x their median
๐ด Fabrice Hawkins : ยซ ๐๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ง ๐ฉ๐ข๐๐ฅ ๐๐ ๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฬ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ฃ๐จ๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐๐ฬ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง ๐๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐๐โฆ ๐๐ ยป https://t.co/iWsJYcTaq4
- Aug 31, 202631x their median
๐ด Lionel Messi : ยซ ๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ ๐ฃ๐๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐จ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฃ ๐๐ ๐ง๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฆโฆ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐๐ง๐ฅ๐๐ฆ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฬ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ฅ, ๐๐ง ๐๐๐๐จ๐-๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐ง ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐๐. ยป ๐๐ฅบ๐ฆ๐ท https://t.co/cc969AxH03
- Aug 24, 202628x their median
๐ด ๐๐จ๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ฅ๐๐ญ ๐ฃ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐ฆ๐๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ก ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐ ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐๐ก๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐... ๐จ๐ก๐๐ค๐จ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐๐๐ก ๐๐๐ฉ๐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข๐๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ โฌ ! ๐คฏ๐ค ๐๏ธ @marca https://t.co/emJrdb6Qd8
- Sep 28, 202619x their median
๐ด ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ก ๐ ๐จ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ฆ๐ ๐ฬ ๐ก๐๐๐ ๐ช๐ข๐๐ง๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐๐๐ก๐ ! ๐โค๏ธ๐ค ๐๏ธ @cfbayern https://t.co/I6UPdrWvik
- Aug 31, 202619x their median
๐๐ ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฅ ๐ค๐จโ๐ข๐ก ๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐จ๐ง๐๐๐ง ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐จ๐ฆ ๐๐ฆ๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐๐ฉ๐ฬโฆ ๐ฅบ๐ฆ๐ท https://t.co/lPYfaevXft
- Sep 9, 202611x their median
๐ด ๐๐ต๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต๐ฎ ๐๐๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐๐ธ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ฎ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐฬง๐ผ๐ถ๐ ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ต๐ฒฬ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐๐ฟ ๐ท๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐น๐ฎ ๐๐ถ๐ด๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ-๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐ชโฅ๏ธ๐ https://t.co/EoCy3BY5ni
- Sep 28, 202610x their median
๐ฃ๏ธ Joรฃo Fรฉlix ๐ต๐น : ยซ ๐๐ ๐ฉ๐๐จ๐ซ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ข๐จ๐ฅ๐ก๐๐ฅ ๐๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฃ๐, ๐ฅ๐๐๐ข๐จ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐๐จ๐ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐ก๐ฆ ๐๐ง ๐๐๐ฆ๐ฃ๐จ๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ฆ ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ ๐๐๐จ๐ง ๐ก๐๐ฉ๐๐๐จ. ยป ๐๐ช ๐๏ธ @diarioas https://t.co/GO8RBpDJPB
- Sep 28, 202610.0x their median
๐ด ๐๐๐๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฉ๐๐ ๐ฅ๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ง ๐ง๐ฌ๐ฅ๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐๐๐ ! ๐๐โค๏ธ Le Barรงa veut renforcer son couloir gauche et surveille les deux latรฉraux, qui seront libres en 2027. โ๏ธ ๐๏ธ @sport https://t.co/6hKFfiDwlM
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 203 interactions against 772K followers, an engagement rate of 0.026%. Measured over 171 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 2.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 171 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.
- What is Vibes Foot's engagement rate on X?
- Vibes Foot (@VibesFoot) has an engagement rate of 0.026%, based on the median interactions across 171 original posts from the last 30 days against 772,238 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.026%, Vibes Foot sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VibesFoot have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VibesFoot post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.77 posts per day across the measured window.