Back to @VaultWatcher's profile

Vault Watcher engagement report

@VaultWatcher - 163K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 163K followers
Per impression
0.267%
374 views on a typical post
Reach
0.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 374 times each, and 0.267% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 10078x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vault Watcher's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Vault Watcher sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video82% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link33% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 593 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 202610078x their median

    Scammers found a way to make people drain their own wallets without sending them a phishing link. They uploaded YouTube tutorials showing people how to build an AI crypto trading bot with Claude. People followed the tutorial themselves. Copied the code. Deployed the smart contract themselves. Funded it from their own wallets. And approved every transaction themselves. Except the “trading bot” had no trading logic. It was built to send their ETH straight to the scammers. 224 wallets lost 274.6 ETH, worth about $517,000 when it was stolen. The median victim lost 1 ETH. Some victims even got an error after getting drained telling them to deposit another 50% to fix the bot. They literally got people to build, fund and approve their own wallet drainer. You've got to be very careful this days

    7.9K1.3K577307718K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20267516x their median

    Zecboys are coming to @Zcash. Just 3,333 faces hidden in plain Z. Whitelist applications are now open. Apply now: https://t.co/peuG1sRxLL https://t.co/NXOoz1wJk3

    2.8K2.3K6911.6K161K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262073x their median

    The weekend is here, but your streak shouldn’t pause now. Seven check-ins unlock this week's badge and unlock a bigger QE reward. Keep showing up, operative. → https://t.co/zuuezllHGW https://t.co/fm5RNU6MNg

    1.1K19852324433K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261847x their median

    Apply to join Phase 2 Test zero slippage stablecoin swaps. Start here 👇 https://t.co/85NtXkQPR9 https://t.co/vF2hdmhbJc

    1.0K5232376649K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20261645x their median

    MINT Live. shielded on zcash. 2800 faces. hold one and it upgrades. https://t.co/8ZI9IGjjcW https://t.co/04WrrjgCnR

    84980544172199K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026740x their median

    2 Days till mainnet @arc https://t.co/Sd6TM45Zp8

    511761341916K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 2026141x their median

    I will make 5 figs Before the end of 2026

    9604144.7K viewsView on X
  • May 31, 202651x their median

    Alright, let's talk about BTC today Everyone is waiting for lower prices, but the data tells a different story. • Weekly RSI has reached levels seen only near previous macro bottoms. • The $60K–$69K zone is the previous cycle high and remains a major support area. • Current correction is already deep into the historical bear market timeline. • Sentiment is at extreme fear levels while most market veterans have gone quiet. Could BTC wick to $55K? Absolutely. But unless we get a true black swan event, a sustained move below $60K looks increasingly unlikely. For now, my base case remains: → Macro bottom near $60K → EMA 21/50 reclaim = trend confirmation → $80K+ becomes the next major level to

    404706.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20267.0x their median

    GM ☕️ Bitcoin $81,500 https://t.co/amgCxMWkab

    3130234 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20267.0x their median

    🚨 $DACT TGE DATE REVEALED? gDAC fam, October 22 is the date to watch. According to the vesting schedule shared for @dac_chain, the $DACT Token Generation Event is scheduled for October 22, 2026, at 00:00 UTC. Here are the key numbers every DAC farmer should know: • Total supply: 1B $DACT • Grant/Airdrop allocation: 75M $DACT (7.5%) • Airdrop vesting: 24 months • Initial floating supply shown in the schedule: 145M $DACT (14.5%) The Grant/Airdrop allocation has no cliff, but that doesn't mean all 75M tokens will be unlocked immediately. Vesting is scheduled to happen gradually over 24 months One important thing to remember: the total airdrop allocation isn't your personal allocation, and the vesting schedule alone doesn't confirm individual claim dates After spending months farming QE, collecting badges, and staying active through DAC's testnet journey, I'm waiting to see how early contributors will be rewarded October 22 could be a big milestone for the DAC community who’s still waiting for the airdrop?

    5110818 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 374 times each, and 0.267% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 10078x its own typical post.

What is Vault Watcher's engagement rate on X?
Vault Watcher (@VaultWatcher) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 162,712 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Vault Watcher sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VaultWatcher have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @VaultWatcher post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going