Vault Watcher engagement report
@VaultWatcher - 163K followers on X
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 374 times each, and 0.267% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 10078x its own typical post.
Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Vault Watcher's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Vault Watcher sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 82% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 33% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 82% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 33% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 593 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 20, 202610078x their median
Scammers found a way to make people drain their own wallets without sending them a phishing link. They uploaded YouTube tutorials showing people how to build an AI crypto trading bot with Claude. People followed the tutorial themselves. Copied the code. Deployed the smart contract themselves. Funded it from their own wallets. And approved every transaction themselves. Except the “trading bot” had no trading logic. It was built to send their ETH straight to the scammers. 224 wallets lost 274.6 ETH, worth about $517,000 when it was stolen. The median victim lost 1 ETH. Some victims even got an error after getting drained telling them to deposit another 50% to fix the bot. They literally got people to build, fund and approve their own wallet drainer. You've got to be very careful this days
- Sep 19, 20267516x their median
Zecboys are coming to @Zcash. Just 3,333 faces hidden in plain Z. Whitelist applications are now open. Apply now: https://t.co/peuG1sRxLL https://t.co/NXOoz1wJk3
- Oct 9, 20262073x their median
The weekend is here, but your streak shouldn’t pause now. Seven check-ins unlock this week's badge and unlock a bigger QE reward. Keep showing up, operative. → https://t.co/zuuezllHGW https://t.co/fm5RNU6MNg
- Sep 18, 20261847x their median
Apply to join Phase 2 Test zero slippage stablecoin swaps. Start here 👇 https://t.co/85NtXkQPR9 https://t.co/vF2hdmhbJc
- Sep 21, 20261645x their median
MINT Live. shielded on zcash. 2800 faces. hold one and it upgrades. https://t.co/8ZI9IGjjcW https://t.co/04WrrjgCnR
- Sep 14, 2026740x their median
2 Days till mainnet @arc https://t.co/Sd6TM45Zp8
- Oct 10, 2026141x their median
I will make 5 figs Before the end of 2026
- May 31, 202651x their median
Alright, let's talk about BTC today Everyone is waiting for lower prices, but the data tells a different story. • Weekly RSI has reached levels seen only near previous macro bottoms. • The $60K–$69K zone is the previous cycle high and remains a major support area. • Current correction is already deep into the historical bear market timeline. • Sentiment is at extreme fear levels while most market veterans have gone quiet. Could BTC wick to $55K? Absolutely. But unless we get a true black swan event, a sustained move below $60K looks increasingly unlikely. For now, my base case remains: → Macro bottom near $60K → EMA 21/50 reclaim = trend confirmation → $80K+ becomes the next major level to
- Oct 23, 20267.0x their median
GM ☕️ Bitcoin $81,500 https://t.co/amgCxMWkab
- Oct 9, 20267.0x their median
🚨 $DACT TGE DATE REVEALED? gDAC fam, October 22 is the date to watch. According to the vesting schedule shared for @dac_chain, the $DACT Token Generation Event is scheduled for October 22, 2026, at 00:00 UTC. Here are the key numbers every DAC farmer should know: • Total supply: 1B $DACT • Grant/Airdrop allocation: 75M $DACT (7.5%) • Airdrop vesting: 24 months • Initial floating supply shown in the schedule: 145M $DACT (14.5%) The Grant/Airdrop allocation has no cliff, but that doesn't mean all 75M tokens will be unlocked immediately. Vesting is scheduled to happen gradually over 24 months One important thing to remember: the total airdrop allocation isn't your personal allocation, and the vesting schedule alone doesn't confirm individual claim dates After spending months farming QE, collecting badges, and staying active through DAC's testnet journey, I'm waiting to see how early contributors will be rewarded October 22 could be a big milestone for the DAC community who’s still waiting for the airdrop?
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 163K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 374 times each, and 0.267% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 82% carry an image or video and 33% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 10078x its own typical post.
- What is Vault Watcher's engagement rate on X?
- Vault Watcher (@VaultWatcher) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 162,712 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Vault Watcher sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @VaultWatcher have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @VaultWatcher post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.