Back to @Vanarchain's profile

Vanar engagement report

@Vanarchain - 139K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.09%
of 139K followers
Per impression
1.51%
8.5K views on a typical post
Reach
5.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
129
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 129 interactions against 139K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Vanar's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 53% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.09%, Vanar sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,676 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video72% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 72% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 531 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 20269.2x their median

    🤝 Vanar × @hinkal_protocol AI Organisations need secure payments, private settlement, compliant treasury flows, and infrastructure that protects business activity on public blockchains. That is where Vanar and Hinkal align. Hinkal enables confidential USDT and USDC settlement across EVM chains, Tron, and Solana, helping wallets, payment platforms, payroll providers, custody platforms, neobanks, OTCs, and merchants protect senders, recipients, amounts, treasury flows, and counterparty relationships on public explorers. With over $1B in processed volume, KYT-based compliance, and backing from Draper Associates, SALT, NGC, NLH, Psalion, Aquanow, and others, Hinkal brings serious infrastructure for private, compliant on-chain payments. Together, we’ll explore how AI Organisations, confidential settlement, treasury protection, and compliant payment infrastructure can support the next phase of AI-powered Web3. A lot to build together.

    1.1K1041114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20263.6x their median

    The VANRY migration portal is NOW live. Self-custody holders can now migrate VANRY to Base through the official Vanar swap portal: https://t.co/1W3JbxvM4F Migration is 1:1. The swap window is open for 30 days.

    292431293150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.5x their median

    VANRY is now live on Aerodrome. The leading liquidity hub on Base keeps getting stronger. With around $1.6B in volume, $1.41M in fees, and $286.38M in TVL, @aeroxyz has become the place where liquidity on Base happens. As VANRY expands on Base, we’re excited to have our pool live on one of the ecosystem’s strongest DeFi venues. Big shoutout to @aeroxyz. Let’s build 🤝

    2492946193K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.5x their median

    VANRY migration support is now live. We launched a dedicated support bot on https://t.co/JVzHRyoxsV to help answer questions around the VANRY swap, migration process, supported chains, Base contract, exchange guidance, safety rules, and what holders need to do. You can find it as a widget on the site. If you have any question about the migration, start there. If the bot cannot answer something, the question will be passed to the Vanar team so we can review it and respond properly. Official support starts here: https://t.co/JVzHRyoxsV

    2442354298K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.3x their median

    LBank has announced support for the VANRY migration to Base. Another major exchange joining the migration, another step forward for VANRY holders, and another signal that the move to Base is gaining momentum. Please follow @LBank_Exchange official announcement for full details and exchange-specific instructions: https://t.co/KtYw8LYCO8 More exchange updates coming.

    2162058177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.2x their median

    INDODAX has announced support for the VANRY migration to Base. @indodax, Indonesia Digital Asset Exchange, is the largest cryptocurrency exchange in Indonesia, making this an important update for VANRY holders in the region. Base deposits and withdrawals will be announced separately by INDODAX, and VANRY trading remains available as usual unless they publish further updates. Please follow INDODAX’s official announcement for full details and exchange-specific instructions: https://t.co/dywh1Rr2Qi More updates will follow as partners confirm support.

    21320461115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.9x their median

    AI agents are useful, but agents alone are not the endgame. One agent can answer a question, write a post, scan data, generate code or complete a task. But a business is not one task. A business has roles, memory, customers, payments, permissions, delivery, support, reputation and decisions that build on each other over time. That is why the next step is not just AI agents. It is AI Organisations. Foundry launches this August, with a 100M VANRY reward pool for early Orgs. Are you ready? Whitelist: https://t.co/YUuTvr6iSJ

    1681858098K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20261.7x their median

    WEEX confirmes support for the VANRY network migration! @WEEX_Official has grown into one of the world’s most trusted crypto exchanges, serving 6.2M+ users across 130+ countries, making this another significant step in expanding access to $VANRY as Vanar moves into its next chapter on Base. Official announcement: https://t.co/58yAxuK7e6

    15622432102K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.7x their median

    🤝 Vanar × @Zypher_Network We’re excited to collaborate with Zypher DAO, an AI and ZK-powered ecosystem focused on verifiable AI, privacy, and intelligent digital economies. Together, we’ll explore how verifiable AI infrastructure and AI Organisations can work together across execution, coordination, trust, payments, and on-chain proof. AI teams need more than automation. They need verification, memory, identity, reputation, and rails to operate. That’s where this collaboration gets interesting. From ZK-powered AI to AI-run Organisations, there’s a lot to build together.

    1621544078K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261.7x their median

    As communicated, the $VANRY migration has now been completed. The Ethereum and Polygon contracts are now paused, and $VANRY trading continues exclusively on Base. Tomorrow, Friday 18 September, the Vanar L1 blockchain will begin its wind-down, formally closing this chapter of Vanar’s journey. This marks the start of the next era. Vanar is now moving forward on Base, with the focus shifting fully toward Foundry, AI Organizations, and the economy being built around them. Foundry launches October 1. One chapter ends. A much bigger one begins now.

    1401266115K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 129 interactions against 139K followers, an engagement rate of 0.09%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.5K times each, and 1.51% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 72% carry an image or video and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 9.2x its own typical post.

What is Vanar's engagement rate on X?
Vanar (@Vanarchain) has an engagement rate of 0.09%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 138,543 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.09%, Vanar sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Vanarchain have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Vanarchain post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going