Back to @V_Lady2024's profile

πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘ engagement report

@V_Lady2024 - 143K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.043%
of 143K followers
Per impression
3.30%
1.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
62
interactions (median)
Saved
0.106%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 3.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 275 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘'s engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 76% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.043%, πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 278 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 20264.4x their median

    See me through the heart, I’m equal parts fire, mystery, and love. β€οΈπŸ–€ https://t.co/vk9GjNM50z

    219124312.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.3x their median

    Happy R.E.D. Friday. Today we wear red to Remember Everyone Deployed. While many of us go about our usual Friday, thousands of service members are standing watch far from home, missing the people they love. A red shirt, tie, or hat will not bring them home sooner. It simply says: we see you. We have not forgotten you. Your families are not waiting alone. Wear red today. Share the message. Keep them in your thoughts. Until they all come home. @Dave_KC_ @CrystalSin22064 @BlondeOfWar

    126216002.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.0x their median

    Goodnight everyone, catch ya on the other side of midnight 😘 https://t.co/xBaoRnIeHF

    124135112.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.9x their median

    A warm fire, a cold drink, and my faithful protector by my side, this is my kind of peace. πŸ”₯🐾🀎 https://t.co/V0ALBCR9Fw

    142112512.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20262.5x their median

    Every rose reminds me how loved I am. Today, I’m sending one back to remind you how deeply you are loved . 🌹❀️ @RealLastLawman https://t.co/JYQ4HzYWaH

    11073512.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20261.8x their median

    Four friends, one bar, and enough attitude to own the whole night. πŸ–€πŸ»βœ¨ @MAGAPowerhouse @BlondeOfWar @Diana152281 @V_Lady2024 https://t.co/h8Q6KsxwZb

    67221924.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20261.6x their median

    πŸˆβ€β¬›πŸ‚ Happy Caturday everyone! https://t.co/uVjpi0VFi2

    714260975 viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    She had been a wilted rose for a long time. After the divorce she folded her life smaller, petal by petal, until what remained was quiet and careful. She told herself she would not reach again. Not unless love itself arrived already blessed. One night she whispered it like a vow: if she were ever to love again, he would have to be sent from above. Then she closed the prayer the way she had learned to close every tender thing, with thank you, and she let the words go. One day he was simply there. Not loud. Not demanding. A presence that felt like warmth after a long winter. Something in her recognized him before her mind would allow it. He felt right in a way that frightened her. So she offered him the cold shoulder instead of her hand. Distance felt safer than hope. She kept her face composed, her answers short, her heart locked behind the habit of surviving. He did not push. He stayed near without crowding her. He spoke gently. He waited as if he already understood that some gardens open only after the frost has fully left the ground. Slowly, almost against her will, the first green returned. A laugh she had forgotten she still owned. A glance held a second longer than she meant. The way his tenderness did not ask her to be unbroken, only present. The wilted rose, which had learned to live on almost nothing, began to drink again. Color crept back into the petals. The stem straightened. What had been closed from pain began, quietly, to unfurl. She had prayed for someone sent from above. What arrived was not a thunderclap. It was a man who was patient with her fear. A love so tender it did not rip the old wounds open; it sat beside them until they no longer needed to be guarded. And love bloomed. Not all at once. The way a rose blooms: one reluctant petal, then another, then the whole flower turning toward the light it no longer believed would come. She stopped offering him only her cold shoulder. She offered him the garden she had been too afraid to tend. In that offering the wilted rose became beautiful again, not because the past had vanished, but because something holy had been allowed to grow in the same soil. She had said thank you at the end of each prayer. And she still says it, And now , Love blooms 🌹

    5341201.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026

    Have a wonderful Saturday everyone, catch ya later πŸ’—πŸ˜˜πŸ«Ά https://t.co/lzVeJdzmjT

    515801.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    QT your Lumberjack πŸͺ“πŸŒ² @V_Lady2024 @NatashaAKA2a @GeneralPatton83 Anyone can join!πŸͺ“πŸŒ² https://t.co/zNsBhQKd9k

    3561557.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.043%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.9K times each, and 3.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 275 interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.

What is πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘'s engagement rate on X?
πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘ (@V_Lady2024) has an engagement rate of 0.043%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 142,865 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.043%, πΏπ’Άπ’Ήπ“Ž 𝒱 πŸ‘‘ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @V_Lady2024 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @V_Lady2024 post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going