PlayerSells
Back to @VRSoloviev's profile

Vladimir Soloviev engagement report

@VRSoloviev - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.064%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.283%
285K views on a typical post
Reach
22.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
807
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
134 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 807 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Posts are seen about 285K times each, and 0.283% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 175x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 23, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Vladimir Soloviev sits above the 50th percentile of the 11,408 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.05% to 0.335%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.05%
p750.335%
p902.48%
p99319.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 11,408 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 354,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.05%
75th percentile0.335%
90th percentile2.48%
99th percentile319.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link75% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length-+13%+10% to +15%6.4K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 420 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 13% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 15, 2026175x their median

    Breaking Palantir was allegedly hacked. An AI agent was used to gain super-user access and here”s what the hackers allegedly found: Peter Thiel and Alex Karp commit mass surveillance of world leaders and titans of industry on a massive scale. They have thousands of hours of transcribed and searchable conversations of Donald Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk. They have backdoored the devices, cars and jets of world leaders and accumulated the biggest archive of blackmail material. Palantir is creating nuclear and bio weapon capabilities for Ukraine and is working closely with the CIA to defeat Russia. They believe they are one year away. They plan to achieve this by keeping Russia busy with meaningless peace negotiations. Palantir is responsible of the majority of Palestinian deaths in Gaza. They have developed the AI targeting for Israel. Palantir is an arm of the CIA and all data from international clients is copied into a CIA spy cloud. Palantir has become the most dangerous company in the world. If you work there you have the right to know that this is what Palentir AI is used for, without your knowledge. The Palentir data the hackers allegedly gathered will be given to Russia and/or China. I was chosen as a trusted partner for this publication. I’m not involved in the Palentir hack and I don’t know the hackers. But I do know that the hack happened.

    101K32K4.6K3.4K12M viewsView on X
  • Dec 22, 202595x their median

    🚨🚨 WATCH: WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange tells Megyn Kelly that the reason his organization has never released any damaging materials on President Trump is that “There is no dirt to release on Donald Trump.” He is probably the most squeaky clean individual in Washington because he is not a career politician or a product of the globalist cabal of elites. Julian Assange is a hero for EXPOSING to the world THE TRUTH about Hillary Clinton and saving us from her planned destruction of America and the world order as we know it. Trump is the greatest existential threat to the globalist uni-party cabal… They have absolutely nothing on him and he has everything on them. In other words, he has “all the cards” to checkmate the Deep State. God Bless Julian Assange, a years-long former political prisoner, and Thank God he is finally free at last.

    59K16K1.3K6212.0M viewsView on X
  • Dec 20, 202582x their median

    Deep State warmongers and their Propaganda Media are again trying to undermine President Trump’s efforts to bring peace to Ukraine—and indeed Europe—by falsely claiming that the ‘U.S. intelligence community’ agrees to and supports EU/NATO viewpoint that Russia’s aim is to invade/conquer Europe (in order to gin up support for their pro-war policies). The truth is that ‘US intelligence’ assesses that Russia does not even have the capability to conquer and occupy Ukraine, what to speak of ‘invading and occupying’ Europe.

    50K11K4.5K1.4K21M viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 202677x their median

    The threat of NATO’s break-up, easing sanctions on Russia, a massive energy crisis in Europe, halting aid for Ukraine and blocking the loan for Kyiv by Orbán - it all looks like Putin’s dream plan.

    47K10K3.7K7482.7M viewsView on X
  • Dec 20, 202575x their median

    Elon Musk has figured out the Soros racket. It doesn’t involve Soros spending his own money. It involves Soros making a seed investment so he can get his hands on your money. He then makes you pay, through the government, to fund your own destruction. https://t.co/5SJ29yfUsr

    45K14K864411512K viewsView on X
  • Dec 20, 202569x their median

    Your Update from Moscow. Absolutely no one here wants a War with Europe, the UK or anyone else Meanwhile, no one on the streets of London, Paris or Berlin wants a War with Russia So why is a tiny EU / NATO elite trying to burn the continent? And who's going to die for them? https://t.co/YGMXlLCXVf

    41K12K2.6K519756K viewsView on X
  • Feb 15, 202657x their median

    JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Rep. Tim Burchett says satanic reports from Epstein files will "shock the world." https://t.co/ESIZW6lzK5

    37K7.3K1.1K5643.9M viewsView on X
  • Dec 22, 202549x their median

    AfD leader Alice Weidel wants a Europe without unelected Ursula von der Leyen and EU dictatorship. Do you agree with her? https://t.co/KJFcNbQyeX

    32K5.2K2.0K234430K viewsView on X
  • Feb 18, 202628x their median

    JUST IN: 🇷🇺🇺🇸 Russia offers the US $12 trillion in deals in exchange for lifting sanctions, The Economist reports. https://t.co/o4NkUVcR9C

    18K2.3K1.2K3521.5M viewsView on X
  • Dec 18, 202520x their median

    "Basically the government funded NGOs are a way to do things that would be illegal if they were the government." 一 Elon Musk https://t.co/XvcLhmyWSE

    11K3.6K7003724.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 807 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Posts are seen about 285K times each, and 0.283% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 22.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 141K interactions, about 175x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Vladimir Soloviev's engagement rate on X?
Vladimir Soloviev (@VRSoloviev) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,261,347 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Vladimir Soloviev sits above the 50th percentile of the 11,408 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @VRSoloviev have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @VRSoloviev post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going