Back to @UtdFaithfuls's profile

UF engagement report

@UtdFaithfuls - 539K followers on X

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.929%
of 539K followers
Per impression
7.03%
71K views on a typical post
Reach
13.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 5.0K interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.929%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 7.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #imabaleba, #lfc, #psg.

Measured over 48 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #imabaleba, #lfc, #psg.

Compared with accounts its own size

UF's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.929%, UF sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99156.3%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,701 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 104,204 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile156.3%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 202617x their median

    🚨 Bruno Fernandes: “I’m sure our fans will love Baleba!”. “He’s a very energetic player. Strong physically, he can push us up the pitch driving the ball. Young and exciting, the club have been following him for two years”. https://t.co/kAhqlPKDWt

    81K4.3K476903.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202615x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Liverpool reach agreement in principle on terms of deal to sign Bradley Barcola from Paris Saint-Germain. Still details to finalise between #LFC & #PSG but moving fast after breakthrough overnight on package ~£120m, ~£100m fixed @TheAthleticFC https://t.co/HhklnZIifL

    61K8.4K2.5K5.0K6.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.0x their median

    Elliot Anderson — £116m. Baleba, Santos, AND Tielemans — £150m. https://t.co/sR5z8vKILo

    19K1.1K10146358K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.8x their median

    🚨🗣 - Out of the squad, who's going to be a player to watch this year? Bruno Fernandes: "Andre Santos." https://t.co/ItIzu0qAZB

    19K492207255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.8x their median

    🚨🗣 - Burna Boy on supporting Man Utd: "To be fair, that's a family thing. I had no choice... I didn't get to pick. "You have to be United or you find another family." 😅 [@Toluwase_x] https://t.co/7K9YUgc5If

    17K1.7K112104321K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.4x their median

    🎥 - Mbeumo telling Sesko he'll do Cantona's celebration when he scores. 😂❤️ https://t.co/tZiG5DP0oo

    16K1.0K6256355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.8x their median

    🚨🗣 - Roy Keane on Man Utd's chances if they sign Baleba: "A good midfield, but if you're on about winning the league, they're still short. "United's BIG problems are going to be DEFENSIVELY. "Midfield and forwards, there's a big goal threat, but the issue is at the BACK "The fullbacks and two centre halves... still a big issue." [@WeAreTheOverlap]

    13K645267149675K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.6x their median

    Are they our best CB pairing when fit? https://t.co/RG4ItXJE6M

    12K548393187225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    THIS IS GONNA HIT HARD NOW!!! 🔥 #ImABaleba https://t.co/CiPtmgquOA

    11K9682727206K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.1x their median

    🚨🗣 - A Man Utd player to watch this season? Harry Maguire: "Shea Lacey." ✨️ https://t.co/dGN8NOwHk0

    10K2438687K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#imabaleba#lfc#psg

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5.0K interactions against 539K followers, an engagement rate of 0.929%. Measured over 48 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 71K times each, and 7.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 48 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 86K interactions, about 17x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #imabaleba, #lfc, #psg.

What is UF's engagement rate on X?
UF (@UtdFaithfuls) has an engagement rate of 0.929%, based on the median interactions across 48 original posts from the last 30 days against 538,944 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.929%, UF sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,701 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @UtdFaithfuls have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @UtdFaithfuls post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

UF (@UtdFaithfuls) Engagement Rate - 0.929% | PlayerSells