Ice Universe engagement report
@UniverseIce - 598K followers on X
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 598K followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #oppoai, #oppocoloros17, #oppofindx10series.
Measured over 80 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #oppoai, #oppocoloros17, #oppofindx10series.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ice Universe's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.17%, Ice Universe sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 596 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 202611x their median
The iPhone Duo’s dreamlike transition animation. This is a level of elegance Samsung will never be able to surpass. I’d even tell Samsung this: you might as well give up on the foldable market. You don’t stand a chance anymore. https://t.co/U9E4MZ6CFp
- Sep 10, 20267.2x their median
That's insane, the developers are absolutely crazy! But I think the most important thing here is creativity. Why didn't Samsung think of this idea in the past 8 years? Creativity is what really matters https://t.co/wRHY5KGDmw
- Sep 11, 20267.0x their median
The more iPhone Duo hands-on videos I watch, the more I feel that Samsung was just muddling through before Apple arrived. Samsung has been making foldables for years, yet it never seems to have figured out what the experience should actually be like. Everything follows an engineering mindset: the screen folds, the features work, job done. But how much thought has gone into the transition between folded and unfolded, the little details of every interaction, and how it all actually feels to use? Then Apple comes along, and suddenly you realize: a foldable can do this? It can feel like this? Things we had grown used to, and even accepted as inevitable, suddenly turn out to have so much room for improvement. To me, Apple has both redefined the foldable and expanded our understanding of what one can be. That’s the difference between a great product and a mediocre one. Now I look at the Galaxy Z Fold 8 in my hand, and it honestly looks like an idiot. Samsung, please just stick to supplying hardware components. You really aren’t cut out to make software or finished consumer products.
- Sep 14, 20266.8x their median
I just feel like I've seen iPhone 18 Pro's burgundy red somewhere. Now I have finally found the source. https://t.co/T3g9Mkm6p3
- Sep 28, 20265.8x their median
If I ever get the chance to meet Apple’s CEO, the first question I might ask is: Why the hell are the bezels on the Apple Watch Series 12 so damn thick? They look like shit. 😂 https://t.co/hr9GzS4mEL
- Sep 2, 20264.6x their median
Galaxy S27 series, tired, bored, exhausted, no excitement anymore https://t.co/wbnV5ueRaC
- Aug 19, 20263.8x their median
Awesome. https://t.co/yKqqi8plK0
- Sep 27, 20263.8x their median
Can you tell which one is iOS? https://t.co/2KAnmjhwaO
- Aug 25, 20263.6x their median
OnLeaks has completed the CAD-based renders of the Galaxy S27 Ultra, confirming that my information was completely accurate. You can hate it, you can reject it, but this is the reality. @OnLeaks https://t.co/H144FbLjY4
- Sep 13, 20263.6x their median
Apple seems to have completely given up on keeping iPhone weight under control. iPhone 18 Pro: 211g iPhone 18 Pro Max: 249g iPhone Duo: 254g At this point, every iPhone should come with AppleCare+ and a complimentary insurance policy for wrist tendonitis.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 598K followers, an engagement rate of 0.17%. Measured over 80 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 1.41% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 80 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #oppoai, #oppocoloros17, #oppofindx10series.
- What is Ice Universe's engagement rate on X?
- Ice Universe (@UniverseIce) has an engagement rate of 0.17%, based on the median interactions across 80 original posts from the last 30 days against 597,907 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.17%, Ice Universe sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @UniverseIce have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @UniverseIce post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.4 posts per day across the measured window.